All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
Well most people used gun powder for guns
Oil paints in tubes development made it possible for the impressionists to paint outside.
The main advantages of oil paints are their flexibility and depth of coloration.
They can be applied in many exclusive ways, from thin glazes diluted with turpentine to dense thick impasto. Due to the fact it is sluggish to dry, artists can preserve running the paint for lots longer than other forms of paint.
The origins of oil painting, as turned into discovered in 2008, date to at least the seventh-century CE, when anonymous artists used oil that can have been extracted from walnuts or poppies to decorate the ancient cave complex in Bamiyan, Afghanistan.
Learn more about oil painting here: brainly.com/question/1059092
#SPJ4
The implication of taxes on things in Maryland that went unchartered
Today, we use the Gregorian<span> calendar so I believe it's A. </span><span>the 12 month calendar</span>
