Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Complainants, enforcing the contract.
Explanation:
The Lucy Vs Zehmer case was one of decision on if a contract was binding or not on the basis of the undisclosed intentions of the parties involved in the contract. Zehmer alleged that he had jokingly sold and transferred title to Lucy while drunk. However the court ruled that contract for the sale of land to Lucy was valid on the basis that the secret intentions of Zehmer was not known or disclosed in the sale of the land and only his actions count for the contract to be binding.
Answer: Analysis of company's performance by the management.
Explanation: In the management discussion and analysis, the upper management of the company analyze and comment on the qualitative and quantitative characteristic of a company. This is seen as a secondary information in the company's yearly financial statement.
The MD and A, is considered valuable by investors as sometimes the management also comments about the upcoming projects of the company in such statements.
Answer:
the journal entry to record bond issuance:
Dr Cash 1,444,000
Dr Discount on bonds payable 76,000
Cr Bonds payable 1,520,000
amortization of discount on bonds payable = $76,000 / 5 = $15,000
coupon payment = $91,200
total interest expense per year = $106,200
total interest expense for the 5 year period = $106,200 x 5 years = <u>$531,000</u>
<u />
Answer:
Option A is riskier
Explanation:
In this question, we want to know which of the two stocks is riskier.
To answer this, we can use the standard deviation of returns as a risk measure.
For a security with a big value for standard deviation of returns, its per period returns are wider making its range per day large.
Hence, what this means is that out of the two stocks, the one with a larger value of standard deviation of returns will guarantee more risk as it is expected to give a better ranges of price
Now back to the values in the question, we can see that the standard deviation of returns of stock A is greater than that of stock B which this makes it a more risky option
Answer:
1. c. a consolidation
2. a. all of Shale's and Tierra's assets
3. c. all of Shale's and Tierra's debts
Explanation:
1. When multiple companies join up together to form a new company, this is called a Consolidation which is what Shale Shale Oil Corporation and Tierra Frakking Company did when they formed Unified Resources, Inc.
2. In a Consolidation, the previously separate companies move in with all their debt and assets to form the new company. As such, Unified Resources acquires all of Shale's and Tierra's assets.
3. As previously stated, in a Consolidation, the previously separate companies move in with all their debt and assets to form the new company. As such, Unified Resources assumes all of Shale's and Tierra's debts as well.
