This excerpt reinforces that Bismarck’s political views were that Germany looking to Prussia’s power was not about using words and resolutions, but to use violence, which was a big mistake is Bismarck’s point of view politically.
Answer: Useful, because religions affect attitudes and beliefs across cultures.
Explanation:
The knowledge of religions and their associated practices is important for marketing and sales of products at the national and international levels. As if a person belongs to different country or religion will require to practice own religion or celebrate own festival. This is beneficial for the people in the market selling those religion oriented products and services.
Thus this can be considered that the religious believes may affect the attitudes and believes of people of different cultures as well.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.