Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A rhombus is the parallelogram with perpendicular diagonals. All
<u>Correct statements, reasons:</u>
- A - adjacent angles are supplementary
- B - opposite sides are parallel
- C - diagonals are perpendicular
- E - opposite sides are congruent
<u>Incorrect statements, reasons:</u>
- D - opposite angles are congruent, but not supplementary
- F - diagonals are not congruent, it would be square not rhombus
Answer:
Please check the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
f(x) = 3x + x³
Taking differentiate



solving






now solving




Thus, the expression becomes


Thus,
f'(x) = 3 + 3x²
Given that f'(x) = 15
substituting the value f'(x) = 15 in f'(x) = 3 + 3x²
f'(x) = 3 + 3x²
15 = 3 + 3x²
switch sides
3 + 3x² = 15
3x² = 15-3
3x² = 12
Divide both sides by 3
x² = 4



Thus, the value of x will be:

No change is required in the 35th sentence of the consolations of philosophy.
<h3>What does sentence 35 from "The Consolations of Philosophy" explain?</h3>
- The sentence [35] emphasizes how the consolations of philosophy promote students to evaluate difficult material, challenge accepted views, and convey clear ideas in a more pragmatic manner by using the adverb "more pragmatically."
- As a result, Option A is correct and no adjustment is necessary.
- The remaining choices are inappropriate since they do not adequately explain this circumstance.
To learn more about "The Consolations of Philosophy" refer:
brainly.com/question/28073251
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
35th Line: But 35 more pragmatically, the discipline encourages students to analyze complex material, question conventional beliefs, and express thoughts in a concise manner.
What change, if any, should be made at [35th line -The Consolations of Philosophy]?
A) NO CHANGE
B) speaking in a more pragmatic way,
C) speaking in a way more pragmatically,
D) in a more pragmatic-speaking way,
Answer:
mk
Step-by-step explanation:
the answer is B. 2
Both are close to 2 but a little under or a little over