Answer: conditional positive regard
Explanation: Conditional Positive regard refers to an act whereby an individual receives warmth, acceptance etc when some certain standards and conditions are met. For example, a parent praises a child when they receive good grades in their exams and scold vehemently when they get bad grades.
Carl Rogers believed people question themselves and experience negative effects on their self-concept when they receive "conditional positive regards".
Actually Carl Rogers is an advocate for unconditional positive regard( acceptance and support of a person regardless of what the person says or does) and he believed that unconditional positive regard is essential for healthy development.
The first step in developing a HACCP plan is to conduct a hazard analysis. :)
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
I would have to say to whom it may concern. Since it is showing correct vocabulary and directing it towards the person who ends up reading it.