Answer: there is reason to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest
Explanation: Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law enforcement officers to eitherdemonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from being tampered with by the arrestee
in order to justify a vehicular search without a warrant conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured.
The defendant in the case was Rodney Gant who was arrested in a friend's yard for driving with a suspended license. His vehicle was searched after he and his friends had been arrested and secured in police cars, upon which the officers found a weapon as well as a bag of cocaine. He was also charged with possession of a narcotic with intent to distribute.
Gant's lawyer, Thomas Jacobs argued and the court agreed that the search was unconstitutional and didn't fulfil either of the two conditions stated above for a warrantless search.
<span>Because the plan was to surprise the Germans and to land in a place and at a time that they did not expect.</span>
Answer:
Native Americans
Explanation:
Oral Tradition can simply be defined as the way or method of passing of songs, stories such as Story telling, and poems from generation to generation by the word of mouth.
The Native American Literature uses basically symbolism, metaphor and simile; musicality/ chanting,oral tradition. It is shown to have being recognized around late 1800s. Words are both powerful and magical in the oral tradition. Therefore mostly Writers and poets did not claim ownership of the stories, songs and poems; ownership was tribal, not personal.
Native American Literaure was used mainly to communicate ideas and beliefs by constantly telling stories to their offspring and then their offspring will pass it to the next generation.
Answer
Hi,
Delayed gratification applies in retirement in that it can allow a person to qualify for a higher social security payout.
Explanation
Delay of gratification is when a person resists the feeling of taking an immediate available reward while hoping to obtain a more-valued reward in the future. In this stand, one could argue that delayed gratification would make sense in retirement because the social security payout will last longer since it won’t be tapped until later. However, life is short thus another person won’t delay his retirement so long to get the time to enjoy it.
Hope this Helps!
<span> they used? provide a couple of examples of situations in which they are necessary.</span>
