Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Answer:
I believe the answer is lower than poor whites, but higher than enslaved people or it could be equal to poor whites. I am going to say lower than poor whites but higher, but higer than enslaved people. please let me no if I am wrong.
The contract is likely to be voidable because it was formed
as a result of undue influence. Undue influence is being defined as an
individual’s way of influencing others by means of having them to induced them
rather than using their own free will or they are influenced without their full
attention that can lead to certain consequences.
Answer:
Competency Based Interviews. I had to take one one time, and they are actually harder than most people think. They ask simple questions, like if your friend took a bottle of water out of the store, would you cover their cost, and stuff like that.
Explanation:
Vote brainliest and have a wonderful day! : -)