Answer:
a win-win solution
Explanation:
In simple words, A win-win agreement or solution can be understood as a close examination of both your own as well as your opponent's positions in order to reach a mutually satisfactory conclusion that offers you both as much as practicable. That will be considered a win scenario if both of you are satisfied with the outcome of the transaction.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the given case illustrates the lack of win win solution.
The US House of Representatives has 435 members (it's the senate that has 100 members), so we only consider the options that mention this:
a) 435 members and is considered more likely to represent local constituent interests.
b) 435 members and is considered more stable and immune to passing popular whims.
The better answer is a) since the representatives represent their states - so they're more likely to represent their local interests to gain a favour with their voters.
Answer:
C: The Voting Rights Act of 1965
Cortez was thought to be a returned emperor from the Aztec past that promised to come back one day and return to his thrown. With this belief the Aztecs didn't <span>put up as much of a fight as they otherwise would have. Cortez also received</span>