Answer:
Option B ($5,500) is the appropriate choice.
Explanation:
The given expression is:
⇒ 
At the zero (0) level of income, the consumption would be the Autonomous consumption.
then,
Y = 0
On substituting the value of "Y" in the given expression, we get
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒
(%)
Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Answer: Positive, Normative
Explanation: Positive economics is based on facts and objects that can be verified. While, normative economics is based on value based judgement that are difficult to verify.
Making a prediction today about the world's population in twenty years <em>based on current growth trends</em> is an example of <em>positive economics</em>.
<em>Advising</em> the residents of a town to choose a toll road over a freeway extension due to a limited budget and high trucking usage is an example of <em>normative economics</em>.
Answer:
The correct answer is $24,500.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Total Account receivable = $100,000
Amount collected = $70,000
So, if there is sufficient taxable income, then assume tax rate to be 35%.
So, we can calculate the Gains tax by using following formula:
Gain tax = Amount collected × Tax rate
By putting the value, we get
Gain tax = $70,000 × 35%
= $24,500.
Answer:
Please see details below:
Explanation:
Sales $16.540
Salaries Expenses -$7.740
Miscellaneous Expenses -$5.820
Net Income $2.980
Dividends 2.830
Retained Earnings $150.
Balance Sheets
Assets
Cash $8.990
Accounts Receivable $16.540
Equipment $22.590
Land $45.980
TOTAL ASSETS $94.100
Liabilities
Accounts Payable $9.170
TOTAL LIABILITIES 9.170
Equity
Common Stock $84.780
Retained Earnings $ 150
TOTAL EQUITY 84.930