1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Galina-37 [17]
3 years ago
15

The _____ doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomp

lice for the crime he or she aided and abetted, as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Blababa [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: a natural and probable causes doctrine

Explanation:

A natural and probable consequences:

A natural and probable consequences refers to a logical person who can reason what the outcome would be at the absence of any interventions.

evidence are scrutinised to establish whether the action commited with its result are natural and probable.

This means the person is alleged to have acted whilst knowing what was going to happen which means they had an idea of the outcome of that crime that was to be commited but still went ahead with the idea.

You might be interested in
What was the game of treaty that ended the war
AVprozaik [17]

The Treaty of Paris :))

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where was Japan's alternative government headquartered?
Dvinal [7]
Where it was headquarted you ask? it was in Kamakura
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the two court cases?Baker v. Carr (1961) - Shaw v. Reno (1993)A. Ruled that
madreJ [45]

Answer:

(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts

Explanation:

Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.

Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.

5 0
3 years ago
Problems about immigration and solutions
weeeeeb [17]
HOT TOPICS
During these times, good information is your most valuable tool. Bookmark this website and come back frequently to check on the latest developments in the law that may affect you and how to plan for the optimal resolution of your questions.
8 0
3 years ago
Achievements of the Umayyad Caliphs
mojhsa [17]

Answer:

Establishing Arabic as the official language throughout the empire

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What elements are found in all three stories? Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • What kinds of social support are most effective and appropriate in late adulthood?
    11·1 answer
  • What are the reasons for the need to sustain unity and peace among ethnic groups<br>​
    5·1 answer
  • The three basic types of speech impairments are _______, _______, and _______
    10·1 answer
  • What does the 38th parallel do
    10·2 answers
  • By the start of the twenty-first century, American women:_________
    11·1 answer
  • What made Constantinople so amazing?
    11·1 answer
  • many people were injured or killed during the war of Yorktown.how do you think these casualities and losses affected life after
    13·2 answers
  • How can we believe that happiness in our happiness neighbourhood ​
    8·1 answer
  • Individuals typically purchase a hybrid or electric vehicle in order to conserve
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!