Answer:
12.5
30
68.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
1.
-6(a + 8)
Distribute the -6.
-6a - 48
2.
4(1 + 9x)
Distribute the 4.
4 + 36x or 36x + 4
3.
6(-5n + 7)
Distribute the 6.
-30n + 42
4.
(9m + 10) * 2
Rewrite.
2(9m + 10)
Distribute the 2.
18m + 20
5.
(-4 - 3n) * -8
Rewrite.
-8(-4 - 3n)
Distribute the -8.
32 + 24n or 24n + 32
6.
8(-b - 4)
Distribute the 8.
-8b - 32
7.
(1 - 7n) * 5
Rewrite.
5(1 - 7n)
Distribute the 5.
5 - 35n or -35n + 5
8.
-6(x + 4)
Distribute the -6.
-6x - 24
9.
5(3m - 6)
Distribute the 5.
15m - 30
10.
(-6p + 7) * -4
Rewrite.
-4(-6p + 7)
Distribute the -4.
24p - 28
11.
5(b - 1)
Distribute the 5.
5b - 5
12.
(x + 9) * 5
Rewrite.
5(x + 9)
Distribute the 5.
5x + 45
Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
