Answer:
This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.
Explanation:
I agree.
What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.
There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.
Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.
That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "
Answer:
Policymakers submit bills to legal counsel for advice.
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because it is made from president and our thinking
A. I think I’m not sure though
Answer:
The decisions taken by the executive agencies of the United States government determine the course of actions in the matter over which they have jurisdiction.
Thus, for example, the Federal Communications Commission is in charge of regulating matters concerning communications and transmission of information in the national territory, through radio, television, etc. It is even in charge of censoring certain sources of communication that are considered dangerous to the interests of society or national security.
Therefore, their decisions have a direct impact on individuals and groups outside the federal government, since, for example, in the event of censorship of a communication medium, said information presented by the medium in question will not reach individuals. Thus, these are protected from distorted, false or dangerous information, taking care of the normal development of the life of society.
