1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GenaCL600 [577]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following forces us to make choices?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Hitman42 [59]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Opportunity cost

Explanation:

Opportunity cost is known to be the benefit an individual would have enjoyed if he or she had done not something else. It is the sacrifice made in choosing between two options when taking decision. For example: choosing between doing homework or watching a programme on television. Thus, if an individual decide to do the homework, watching a programme on television is the alternative forgone which is the opportunity cost.

Bess [88]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Opportunity cost

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How is the amount of sunlight absorbed by Earth’s surface and the amount of energy released by Earth kept in balance ?
qwelly [4]

Answer:

the uighur u wh view

Explanation:

jdi hej je u eu cj s

4 0
3 years ago
What is regional intergration
larisa [96]

Answer:

Regional integration is the process by which two or more nation-states agree to co-operate and work closely together to achieve peace, stability and wealth.

Usually integration involves one or more written agreements that describe the areas of cooperation in detail, as well as some coordinating bodies representing the countries involved.

This co-operation usually begins with economic integration and as it continues, comes to include political integration. We can describe integration as a scale, with 0 representing no integration at all between two or more countries. Ten would represent complete integration between two or more countries. This means that the integrating states would actually become a new country — in other words, total integration.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What did Slave owning states believe about state's rights?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Rallying Cry of Secession

The appeal to state's rights is of the most potent symbols of the American Civil War, but confusion abounds as to the historical and present meaning of this federalist principle.

The concept of states' rights had been an old idea by 1860. The original thirteen colonies in America in the 1700s, separated from the mother country in Europe by a vast ocean, were use to making many of their own decisions and ignoring quite a few of the rules imposed on them from abroad. During the American Revolution, the founding fathers were forced to compromise with the states to ensure ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a united country. In fact, the original Constitution banned slavery, but Virginia would not accept it; and Massachusetts would not ratify the document without a Bill of Rights.

Secession Speeches

South Carolinians crowd into the streets of Charleston in 1860 to hear speeches promoting secession.

The debate over which powers rightly belonged to the states and which to the Federal Government became heated again in the 1820s and 1830s fueled by the divisive issue of whether slavery would be allowed in the new territories forming as the nation expanded westward.

The Missouri Compromise in 1820 tried to solve the problem but succeeded only temporarily. (It established lands west of the Mississippi and below latitude 36º30' as slave and north of the line—except Missouri—as free.) Abolitionist groups sprang up in the North, making Southerners feel that their way of life was under attack. A violent slave revolt in 1831 in Virginia, Nat Turner’s Rebellion, forced the South to close ranks against criticism out of fear for their lives. They began to argue that slavery was not only necessary, but in fact, it was a positive good.

As the North and the South became more and more different, their goals and desires also separated. Arguments over national policy grew even fiercer. The North’s economic progress as the Southern economy began to stall fueled the fires of resentment. By the 1840s and 1850s, North and South had each evolved extreme positions that had as much to do with serving their own political interests as with the morality of slavery.

As long as there were an equal number of slave-holding states in the South as non-slave-holding states in the North, the two regions had even representation in the Senate and neither could dictate to the other. However, each new territory that applied for statehood threatened to upset this balance of power. Southerners consistently argued for states rights and a weak federal government but it was not until the 1850s that they raised the issue of secession. Southerners argued that, having ratified the Constitution and having agreed to join the new nation in the late 1780s, they retained the power to cancel the agreement and they threatened to do just that unless, as South Carolinian John C. Calhoun put it, the Senate passed a constitutional amendment to give back to the South “the power she possessed of protecting herself before the equilibrium of the two sections was destroyed.”

Controversial—but peaceful—attempts at a solution included legal compromises, arguments, and debates such as the Wilmot Proviso in 1846, Senator Lewis Cass’ idea of popular sovereignty in the late 1840s, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, and the Lincoln-Douglas Debates in 1858. However well-meaning, Southerners felt that the laws favored the Northern economy and were designed to slowly stifle the South out of existence. The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was one of the only pieces of legislation clearly in favor of the South. It meant that Northerners in free states were obligated, regardless of their feelings towards slavery, to turn escaped slaves who had made it North back over to their Southern masters. Northerners strongly resented the law and it was one of the inspirations for the publishing of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852.

6 0
3 years ago
The surface of the sea is not level<br> due to all of the following except
Yuri [45]

Answer:

salinity

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Mesopotamia, what were 3 things city-states had
Alex Ar [27]
Thick surrounding walls, its own government, and a ziggurat in the center of the city-state.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Praising socially withdrawn children when they have eye contact with others and ignoring them after a temper tantrum best illust
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of the doctrinal dimension of religion? A. going on a pilgrimage B. sacrificial offerings C. follow
    9·1 answer
  • Help please!<br> In what was would departing Babylon be like the Exodus?
    9·1 answer
  • As long as you have a works cited list, you cannot be accused of plagiarism.
    11·2 answers
  • How did the great compromise satisfy both small and large states
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Continental Congress assign a committee to write the Declaration of Independence?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was forum important to rome
    14·2 answers
  • Can anyone summarize this is 2 sentences? :’(
    8·1 answer
  • First, explain what is meant by the "Columbian Exchange". Then, give your opinion as to whether or not it had a positive or nega
    9·1 answer
  • Compared to market economies, command economies are usually
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!