All categories

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME!

1 answer:

6 0

I'd like to say that it's C. Values because quality over price refers to it's value. Distinguishing characteristics is vague, Demographics is unrelated, but D could work too.

After reading the question a bit more carefully, D it probably a better answer because they're asking for what the first question is essentially. It's reflecting their buying behaviors, but also their values.

It's a bit back and forth, but I say go with D.

You might be interested in

Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March.

Flura [38]

Answer:

Warnerwoods Company

Perpetual Inventory System:

1. Cost of Goods Available for Sale and Units Available for Sale:

Mar. 1 Beginning inventory 60 units $50.20 per unit $3,012

Mar. 5 Purchase 205 units $55.20 per unit 11,316

Mar. 18 Purchase 65 units $60.20 per unit 3,913

Mar. 25 Purchase 110 units $62.20 per unit 6,842

Available for Sale 440 units Cost = $25,083

2. The number of units in ending inventory:

Units Available for Sale 440

Subtract units sold 310

Ending Inventory 130 units

3. The Cost assigned to ending inventory using:

a) FIFO: Ending Inventory

20 units at $60.20 per unit = $1,204

110 units at $62.20 per unit = 6,842

Ending Inventory $8,046

b) LIFO: Ending Inventory

Mar. 1 Beginning Inventory 45 units $50.20 per unit = $2,259

Mar. 18 Purchase 65 units $60.20 per unit = 3,913

Mar. 25 Purchase 20 units $62.20 per unit = 1,244

Ending Inventory 130 units Cost = $7,416

c) Weighted Average: Ending Inventory

Cost of Goods Available for Sale divided by units available for sale

= $25,083/440 = $57 per unit

Ending Inventory = $57 x 130 = $7,410

d) Specific Identification: Ending Inventory

This cannot be answered from the information provided in the question:

4. Gross Profit for each costing method:

FIFO LIFO WEIGHTED SPECIFIC

AVERAGE IDENTIFICATION

Sales $27,312 $27,312 $27,312 $27,312

Cost of Sales 17,037 17,667 17,670

Gross Profit $10,275 $9,645 $9,642

Explanation:

a) Sales:

Mar. 9 Sales 220 units $85.20 per unit = $18,744

Mar. 29 Sales 90 units $95.20 units = 8,568

Total = $27,312

b) Cost of Sales:

i) FIFO

Mar 1. Beginning inventory 60 units $50.20 per unit = $3,012

Mar. 5 Purchase 205 units $55.20 per unit = 11,316

Mar. 18 Purchase 45 units $60.20 = 2,709

Cost of Sales = $17,037

ii) LIFO:

Mar. 1 Beginning inventory 15 units $50.20 per unit = $753

Mar. 5 Purchase 205 units $55.20 per unit = $11,316

Mar. 25 Purchase 90 units $62.20 per unit = $5,598

Cost of Sales = $17,667

iii) Weighted Average:

Cost of Sales = $57 x 310 = $17,670

c) Calculations under the specific identification cannot be made because of the figures given under this method.

5 0

4 years ago

Suppose that a worker in Cornland can grow either 40 bushels of corn or 10 bushels of oats per year, and a worker in Oatland can

Dafna1 [17]

Answer: d. 340 bushels of corn and 500 bushels of oats.

Explanation:

The country that has the lower opportunity cost in producing a certain commodity is the one with competitive advantage.

Cornland

Opportunity cost of growing Corn = 10/40 = 1/4 bushels of oats

Opportunity cost of growing oats = 40 / 10 = 4 bushels of corn

Oatland

Opportunity cost of growing Corn = 50/5 = 10 bushels of oats

Opportunity cost of growing oats = 5/50 = 1/10 bushels of corn

Cornland therefore has competitive advantage in producing corn and Oatland has competitive advantage in oats.

If both countries traded, Cornland would focus on corn and Oatland would focus on oats.

If all of Cornland's workers focused on corn, production would be:

= 20 * 40 bushels per worker

= 800 bushels of corn

If all of Oatland workers focused on oats, production would be:

= 20 * 50

= 1,000 bushels of oats

Increase in corn would be:

= 800 - (400 bushels from Cornland + 60 bushels from Oatland)

= 340 bushels of corn

Increase in oats:

= 1,000 - (100 bushels from Cornland + 400 bushels from Oatland)

= 500 bushels of oats

4 0

3 years ago

Which one of the following is not an assumption of the EOQ model? Decisions for one item can be made independently of decisions

irga5000 [103]

Answer:

Quantity discounts can be taken advantage of for large lot sizes.

Explanation:

The EOQ model assumptions:

the order of one item does not intervene with the other.

The order will arrive without delay and with a specific amount of goods.

no losses or damage in transit

The EOQ does not consider the discount for large lot size, their formula does not consider the value of the goods:

$Q_{opt} = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}}$

Its use: Demand of the good

cost of Setup, or ordering cost.

and Holding cost, the cost of keeping the inventory

There is no variable to account for discounts for order size in this method

7 0

3 years ago

Freee Brainliest and 10 points Free Brainliest for First person!

rusak2 [61]

Thx amazing person have a great day:)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Stock Y has a beta of 1.2 and an expected return of 12.1%. Stock Z had a beta of 0.8 and an expected return of 7.85%. The risk-f

levacccp [35]

Answer:

Since the expected return and required return are different for both Stock X and Z, we say that they are not correctly priced

Explanation:

To determine whether or not the stocks are correctly priced ,

we have to compare the required return and the expected return on each of them.

Required return = Rf +β (Rm-Rf)

Note that Rm-Rf is also known as market risk premium

Stock Y Stock Z

Required return 2.4% + 1.2(7.2%) 2.4% + 0.8(7.2%)

= 11% = 8.2%

Expected return 12.1% 7.85%

Since the expected return and required return are different for both Stock X and Z, we say that they are not correctly priced

6 0

4 years ago