An act of changing physical location or position or of having this changed.
Answer: Yes.
Explanation: Because they were under the British rule, so that had many negative effects on them. They could not have decisions, politic power. They were rich people, but once the British rule happened, they became lost and slaves.
British rule had some positive effects too, but the most significant effects are the negatives, because Indians became slaves of British people, and their economy was almost lost.
Answer:
The Proletariat would inevitably, according to Marx, rise up against the Bourgeoisie, just as the Bourgeoisie had risen up against the nobility. It was just historical process at work, (according to Marx). The proletariat would create a classless society that would not have "haves" and "have nots" and thus history would be complete.
Explanation:
Answer:
The situation in Iran is very complicated because it is a regime that is very vocal against U.S. interests, that has important sources of wealth like oil and natural gas (even if the country itself is far from being wealthy or developed), and it has had access to uranium, which could be used to produce nuclear weapons.
Explanation:
However, forging a deal with Iran, with the support and in conjunction with the European Union, and other international organizations is a better alternative that direct confrontation with the country. The reason is that it is very difficult to topple the Iranian Regime, it enjoys popular support, and the country itself would be very hard to invade due to the mountainous terrain.
Doing nothing should never be an alternative in international relations, let alone when it comes to Iran. The cons far outweigh the pros, and Iran could use the time to become even more aggressive against U.S. interests and allies.
