It's important to know how a person who experienced the oppression feels.
The correct answer is Brown v Board of Education
In its decision, the Supreme Court overruled the Plessy v Ferguson by ruling that the separation of children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional. This ended racial segregation in public schools
<span>The closest to perfection would be an interdependent Confederation of societies, each containing between one and two hundred citizens, depending upon factors such as location and climate. These villages would be more or less evenly distributed across the globe, having access to roughly equivalent amounts of arable land. Thirty per cent of all land would be designated wilderness, and no societies would be allowed to colonise these areas, but antisocial individuals would be free to inhabit the wilderness following a life-style of total lonesomeness.</span>
In fact, he or she may be more concentrating on procedural issues and acting as moderator.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Procedural issues are a region where modern investment mediation becomes increasingly complex and concerned and something which presently has very little instruction.
There are in addition many important points of divergence from widely accepted procedural rules with respect to international trade mediation.
A moderator is an association between the indicator and the criteria parameter, which determines the frequency of the relationship. Moderators say when a relationship is going to succeed. These can be either subjective or quantitative (e.g. gender)
For example, anxiety has a Major impact on men than women, according to the American Psychological Association.
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
