The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
Jeffersonian’s was less democratic, jacksonian’s expanded suffrage to MOST white men over the age of 21.
Answer:
Both countries engaged in the mass killing of innocent people in
conquered territories
Explanation:
Answer:
I do believe that the answer to your question is Monticello, which was a primary piece of history for Thomas Jefferson. Monticello was the home he designed and lived at throughout his life.
Answer Separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another. The intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.r:The separation of powers was important when the Founders wrote the U.S. Constitution and is still just as valuable today. ... When the United States won the American Revolution against Great Britain, the colonists became free from the rule of a king. hope this helps have a great night❤️❤️❤️
Explanation:
