The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 were both meant to

Social Studies

1 answer:

Zinaida [17]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

<h3>allow slavery to move into the Louisiana Territory. </h3>

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 both attempted to reduce the conflict between the North and South arising over the issue of slavery.

The Missouri Compromise was an agreement that dealt with the issue of expanding slavery into the Louisiana territory while the Compromise of 1850 gave rights to states like Utah and New Mexico to either allow or disallow slavery in their own respective states.
Thus, it aimed at influencing western slates to join the slavery permitted states.

You might be interested in

How did the outcome of the war affect the federalist partys efforts to change the constitution

Eddi Din [679]

The efforts of the Revolutionary War left our country surviving as individual states holding the most power and bitter rivals for land,economics and such. It also left us with no way to back the continentals (what the money was called) with any substance. In other words continentals were basically not worth much. We also did not have a navy to protect our trade with the West Indies or other British ports and since we owed Spain and could not pay it Spain closed off our waterway - the Mississippi River.
This being done we attempted to come up with a federal government who's power was extremely limited. The federalist regrouped, sat down and created our Constitution- getting rid of the bad parts of the Articles and creating a stronger government. One which has become a leader for other countries.
Hope this helps. Sorry for it being so long- but I'm a substitute teacher which specializes in social studies from 6th to 12th grade.

4 0

3 years ago

Every Friday, Dr. Cruz would give a quiz in his psychology class. Students quickly learned to be nervous on Friday mornings, jus

deff fn [24]

Answer: Extinction

Explanation: The term Extinction refers to the process of disappearing a response from an individual's repertoire. In the responding paradigm, extinction occurs when a conditioned stimulus stops eliciting a particular response.

For example, a <em>person who has developed fear of the elevator</em>, as it comes into contact with the aversion object and nothing bad happens, the "elevator" stimulus loses the function of eliciting anxiety responses. However, it is precisely this need to expose oneself to the aversion stimulus that causes people to sustain the fear.

5 0

4 years ago

Isaiah tells us that god will renew our weary strength with wings like what bird?

IceJOKER [234]

Answer: Eagle

Explanation:

Isaiah 40;31

KJV:But they that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint.

5 0

3 years ago

E-mation Inc. hires Marvin to steal trade secrets from one of its competitors for $10,000. Marvin demands half of the money upfr

Mariulka [41]

The court won't do anything in order to help E-mation to get back its money.

<u>Explanation</u>:

Firstly, the E-mation stole the trade secrets from one of its competitors for $10,000, which is illegal. To do the stealing, the E-mation then hires a person who is Marvin which is also illegal. Marvin becomes a thief here and as he was the one who stole the trade, he had a higher risk of getting punished by the law. So, he decided not to pursue the theft of the trade secret. The court will not be helping E-mation as E-mation will not share the fact of stealing because that can lead to cancellation of his business.

3 0

4 years ago

If you lived in the desert how would your life be different than it is now

nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

you will not have any water and food to survive off of

3 0

3 years ago