How did the outcome of the war affect the federalist partys efforts to change the constitution

1 answer:

4 0

The efforts of the Revolutionary War left our country surviving as individual states holding the most power and bitter rivals for land,economics and such. It also left us with no way to back the continentals (what the money was called) with any substance. In other words continentals were basically not worth much. We also did not have a navy to protect our trade with the West Indies or other British ports and since we owed Spain and could not pay it Spain closed off our waterway - the Mississippi River.
This being done we attempted to come up with a federal government who's power was extremely limited. The federalist regrouped, sat down and created our Constitution- getting rid of the bad parts of the Articles and creating a stronger government. One which has become a leader for other countries.
Hope this helps. Sorry for it being so long- but I'm a substitute teacher which specializes in social studies from 6th to 12th grade.

You might be interested in

European countries made little economic gain from their African colonies? A. True B. False

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

John is dissatisfied at work. He feels he is paid too little and asked to do too much. To compensate for his perceived unjust pa

Dovator [93]

Answer:

deviant behavior

Explanation:

Deviant behavior: The term deviant behavior is defined as a particular individual's behavior which is considered as contradictory to a particular society's dominant norms. An individual who performs deviant behavior can be explained through the psychological, biological, and sociological aspects. Deviant behavior also includes violations of social norms.

Example: Robbery, murder.

In the question above, John's behavior is an example of deviant behavior.

6 0

3 years ago

President andrew johnson was almost impeached. to impeach a president means:

Murljashka [212]

A or c maybe not sure :)

4 0

3 years ago

A generally accepted understanding of "comparative politics" is that it is a method of explaining similarities and differences b

ch4aika [34]

Answer:

Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model. Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such issues as politics of democratic and authoritarian states, political identity, regime change and democratization, voting behavior and a number of others.

Comparativists often ask how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.

Following the democratization example, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.

4 0

3 years ago

How does Russell Baker paint a vivid picture of his mother in "No Gumption"? A. He includes many of her maxims. B. He describes

pogonyaev

A. He includes many of her maxims. B. He describes his parents' courtship

hope this helped

7 0

3 years ago