1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
expeople1 [14]
2 years ago
15

At the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861, pro-Union sentiment was strong in western Virginia, eastern Tennessee, and western Nor

th Carolina primarily because?
History
2 answers:
ElenaW [278]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Fewer slaves and Fewer large plantations were found in these areas

Explanation:

the outbreak of the American civil war in 1861 was majorly because of the unending disagreements between the Union of the North and the confederate states of south over slavery, state rights and the expansion westward.  

The Union was strongly against slavery and the expansion of slavery into new territories as proposed by the south. the south found this opposition worrying because they have built their economy on the use of slave labor to grow agricultural produce for commercial purpose. the continues disagreements finally led to the American civil war in 1861.

pro- union sentiment was strong in Western Virginia, eastern Tennessee and Western North Carolina because there were few slaves and smaller plantations in the regions.

9966 [12]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

There were relatively few slaves or large plantations in these regions

Explanation:

The Civil War in the United States began in 1861, after decades of simmering tensions between northern and southern states over slavery, states’ rights and westward expansion.

Growing abolitionist sentiment in the North after the 1830s and northern opposition to slavery’s extension into the new western territories led many southerners to fear that the existence of slavery in America and thus the backbone of their economy was in danger.

On September 17, the Army of the Potomac hit Lee’s forces (reinforced by Jackson’s) in what became the war’s bloodiest single day of fighting. Total casualties at the Battle of Antietam (also known as the Battle of Sharpsburg) numbered 12,410 of some 69,000 troops on the Union side, and 13,724 of around 52,000 for the Confederates.

You might be interested in
Which battles did NOT occur during World War II
drek231 [11]
The war against england thats what i think
6 0
2 years ago
1860- This person and his Redshirts win victories that will soon lead to the creation of Italy.
Dovator [93]
The wright brothers- 1903
Thomas edison-1879
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The main cause of the Great Depression were
Ksivusya [100]
The main cause was the Stock Market Crash of 1929.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
iren [92.7K]
1. Congress leadership: Nehru and Gandhi underestimated Jinnah, Muslim League, its ambitions and outreach. In the 1920s, Gandhi neglected Jinnah and appealed to Muslims for a common cause, which seemed harmless at that time.In the 1930s, Nehru, assured of the backing of his socialist ideology and the support among the Muslim bases for the same, arrogantly believed that Muslims won't be moved by a party based on faith. It later turned out he was false.In the 1930s, Jinnah was willing to negotiate an agreement with the leadership, but was constantly ignored. This is going over my head. Arrogance and underestimation of someone doesn't go unpunished. However blame is to be equally shared by all the top leaders. In the 1940s, ML with almost a million members had no compulsion to bow out. He had no reason to cut a deal now. He was demanding recklessly. He refused to allow first independence , then partition. I may not comment on the course of history had this been allowed.While Gandhi tried his best possible to stop the painful separation, Nehru wasn't ready to the idea of Jinnah being the first Prime Minister of the independent India till the very end. Patel hoped partition would show Jinnah the fault in his ideas and would seal his fate. Thus the failure of Congress leadership and the rise of Jinnah is interlinked.
2. Jinnah and the Muslim League: He instigated religious passions and fears among the masses since the 30s.He was more concerned with the fact that Muslims and Hindus didn't intermarry or interdine and that Congress didn't have Muslim representatives in the 1946 Provincial Elections. He claimed in his 1940 Muslim League Presidential Address that cultures, literature and way of living and views on life were different of the two communities. The theory of one nation had been carried along too far and that it was nothing but a far fetched dream. I don't think partition gave too much peace either.The provinvcial elections were held on the lines of religion and demand for a new country, rather than on the promises of growth and "independence".Direct Action Day was a call by this great leader. What else do you expect from such a gathering at such a crucial point of time on such a critical issue. If countries could be made by gatherings and processions, I'm going out on the streets to demand the Shubham Kingdom! The violence, retaliation and counter violence led to the inevitable- Partition of two brothers, fighting for petty issues, not ready to listen and even the parents acting as stubborn kids.
4 0
3 years ago
Explain how the role of the united states changed in global affairs during the progressive era
dexar [7]

The Progressive Era is considered from 1890 to 1920.  The major role of the United States in global affairs during this period of time was its involvement in the war.

The military affairs of that time included the war with Spain, the war to conquer the Philippines and the entry into the First World War.

Until the beginning of the 20th. century, political affairs in the US used to follow Washington and Madison,  guidelines of neutrality and nonintervention.

But in those times, European nations turned into imperialism, establishing colonies in different parts of the planet. Time passed by when Theodore Roosevelt, influenced by <em>The Influence of Sea Power Upon History</em>(written by Admiral Alfred Thayer in 1890), understood the potential of investing money in other countries, securing the interest of the U.S.

In the 1910-1920's, the United States government followed an intervention policy in the Caribbean and Central America, the Philippines and even President Wilson supported the Mexican revolution.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Native Americans influence cultures in Europe?
    9·2 answers
  • When the united states, britain and france merged their zones in germany, the soviet union responded by __________________. sele
    14·1 answer
  • When historians say they try to be objective this means all of the following EXCEPT:
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these is a form of authoritarian government in which power is typically handed down through family lines and rulers sta
    6·1 answer
  • What is one requirement for applying to become an American citizen?
    7·2 answers
  • The event called the hijra, which was ____, marks the beginning of islam
    9·2 answers
  • how could the election of 1860 &amp; President Abraham Lincoln have contributed to sectional differences between the North and t
    11·1 answer
  • On what progressive political Issue did Roosevelt and was the most differ during the 1912 presidential campaign
    13·1 answer
  • What might happen if the freedom of the press is not protected?
    13·1 answer
  • Pleaseee help! I’ll mark you too! pwease !
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!