Answer:
It is not a function
Step-by-step explanation:
The plot shows (1, 1) and (1, 3) are both defined by the relation. It does not pass the "vertical line test", which requires the relation be single-valued everywhere.
Answer:
1. Not accounting for the difference in the base of the exponent when applying the quotient rule.
2. Not subtracting the exponents of the denominator from the exponent of the numerator when applying the quotient rule.
Exactly one activity:
246None of the activities :
1At least one activity:
74Snowboarding and Ice skating but not skiing:
5Snowboarding or ice skating but not skiing:
132.
Only skiing :
119.
The diagram is in the attachment.
To solve -7y > 161, we divide both sides by -7 and we get y < -23. The inequality sign flipped because we divided both sides by a negative number.
To solve 7y > -161, we divide both sides by 7 and it leads to y > -23. The inequality sign does not flip in this case, because we are not dividing both sides by a negative number.
The similarities is that we end up with -23 on the right side, but the inequality signs are different.
Answer: your answer will be (b) 0
hope it helps
