1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolezko [41]
3 years ago
10

Select the sentence in this passage that demonstrates the fallacy of evasion

English
2 answers:
nignag [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<h2>However, he deserves little credit, for since that time, still greater strides have been made in battlefield medicine.</h2>

Explanation:

I got 100% on the kahoot.

Fed [463]3 years ago
6 0

Your answer to this will be the last sentence.

However, he deserves little credit, for since that time, still greater strides have been made in battlefield medicine.

I am 100% sure of this

You might be interested in
Now it is time to write about some of the poems you’ve read and studied! So far in this unit, you have examined the following wo
STatiana [176]

Answer:

sorry I do not know bro i wish I could help

3 0
2 years ago
which offers the best comparison of the authors' feelings a bout snakes in "The Black Snake" and "A Narrow Fellow in the Grass"
xxMikexx [17]

The Third!  We did this recently:)  have a good day! hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Paraphrase Madison’s premise in these lines. Why is this a premise and not a claim? The Federalist No
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Summary

Madison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines factions as groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others.

Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact, the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.

Given the nature of man, factions are inevitable. As long as men hold different opinions, have different amounts of wealth, and own different amount of property, they will continue to fraternize with people who are most similar to them. Both serious and trivial reasons account for the formation of factions but the most important source of faction is the unequal distribution of property. Men of greater ability and talent tend to possess more property than those of lesser ability, and since the first object of government is to protect and encourage ability, it follows that the rights of property owners must be protected. Property is divided unequally, and, in addition, there are many different kinds of property. and men have different interests depending upon the kind of property they own. For example, the interests of landowners differ from those who own businesses. Government must not only protect the conflicting interests of property owners but must, at the same time, successfully regulate the conflicts between those with and without property.

To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: to remove its causes and to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence. The government created by the Constitution controls the damage caused by such factions.

The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Pure or direct democracies (countries in which all the citizens participate directly in making the laws) cannot possibly control factious conflicts. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict.

If the new plan of government is adopted, Madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men,­ the best of America. Theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition, but the opposite might happen. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. However, the possibility of this happening in a large country, such as the United States, is greatly reduced. The likelihood that public office will be held by qualified men is greater in large countries because there will be more representatives chosen by a greater number of citizens. This makes it more difficult for the candidates to deceive the people. Representative government is needed in large countries, not to protect the people from the tyranny of the few, but to guard against the rule of the mob.

3 0
3 years ago
A frail and stooped person is likely.
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Older

Explanation:

when people become old they lose strength in there bone which causes them to get hurt easier then they would be at a young age = Frail

When people get older they start to lose posture from all the years of living = which in fact is stooping

4 0
3 years ago
Brainliest if answered efficiently and quickly
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
In my opinion, I would connect the Salem Trials to Islamophobia or really the fear of terrorism. Ever since we were attacked on 9/11, many people have been in fear and continuously blame those are Muslim for many of the problems. Americans would falsely accuse and target the Muslims which was very similar to the Salem Witch Trials. They both caused mass hysteria within the communities which would damage the future of mankind. Both of these events show the impact of not only disagreeing ideologies, but the affect of the masses and the dangers of false accusations. This endangers humankind if people are easily swayed and convinced into such accusations which could lead to war, falsities, and creating even more unnecessary tension. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read the excerpt from Grendel.Now and then some trivial argument would break out, and one of them would kill another one, and al
    5·2 answers
  • 25.
    5·1 answer
  • For school, we have to write a poem based on the events of the civil rights period. Can somebody give me a few ideas or facts on
    11·2 answers
  • In which group of children did scientists find results similar to those in harlow's monkey experiments?
    10·1 answer
  • A 2 minute speech about why i should be house captain.
    10·1 answer
  • 30 points!! What are three major themes of the Great Gatsby? Please please be specific and please give three themes.
    5·1 answer
  • Which could best serve as the theme of a story?
    5·1 answer
  • 4. Read the following passage carefully. "An old couple living near John's
    7·1 answer
  • Tell which of the following is a run-on sentence. Sentence 1: Those huge pickles in the jar! Sentence 2: She went to John’s hous
    14·2 answers
  • Can someone give me information on what I have to put in a works cited page?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!