Answer:
protected; increase
Explanation:
Ozone is composed of trioxygen which is highly reactive gas compared to dioxygen. Ozone layer is present in stratosphere and troposphere and protect the humans from ultraviolet radiations but it may be toxic if inhaled. Ozone can be broken down into molecular oxygen by chlorine and bromine atoms.
A hole was discovered in ozone layer in 1982 and scientist believed that it could be dangerous for human health. The compounds involved in depletion of ozone are mainly Chlorofluorocarbons (CFS) and (HFCS). Then a global agreement was signed in 1987 which leads to prohibition of use of all chemicals that are involved in depletion of ozone layer. The problem of ozone depletion is solved by the agreement and ozone hole started to recover it from 2000.
But recent reports showed that the alternative chemicals used to protect the depletion of ozone layer began to trap the heat inside the earth like greenhouse effect. Now scientists are in search of chemical that can prevent both ozone depletion as well as global warming.
It developed everyones body
Neurotransmitters. With the regard to the process of the neural transmission, a refractory period refers to the time in interval in which. the Positively charged sodium ions are to pumped back to outside a neural membrane.
Neurotransmitters are the chemical messengers that your body can't function without it. Their job is to carry out chemical signals (“messages”) from one of the neuron (nerve cell) to the next target cell. The next target of the cell can be another nerve cell, a muscle cell or the gland.
Fortunately, the seven “small molecule” are neurotransmitters (acetylcholine, dopamine, the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), or glutamate, histamine, norepinephrine, and the serotonin) do the majority of the work.
To know more about Neurotransmitters visit:
brainly.com/question/28101943
#SPJ4
Answer:
D - Other scientists can validate or disprove the findings
Explanation:
Publishing findings of their research projects is important as it enables peer-revision on their journals. The work can then be evaluated by the community at-large to validate or disprove it, which opens the dialogue with associate researchers.