Answer: C. Foreign Corrupt Practises Act (FCPA)
Explanation: The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a United States law passed into law in 1977 that prohibits United State firms and individuals from paying bribes to foreign officials in furtherance of a business deal. The FCPA places no minimum amount for a punishment of a bribery payment. Accurate record-keeping of assets is required by the FCPA to ensure that only properly authorized transactions are taken under the purview of company management.
Answer:
by making sure prisoners are not denied access to basic need such as food, warmth, or exercise
Explanation:
Created by the U.S. Supreme Court, the "identifiable human needs" standard requires prison officials to comply with the Eighth Amendment by <u>making sure prisoners are not denied access to basic need such as food, warmth, or exercise.
</u>
The Supreme Court has created two standards to be used by the courts in determining whether a prisoner's Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment have been violated. The standards are; the "deliberate indifference" standard, and the "identifiable human needs" standard, under the identifiable human needs standards prison officials must ensure prisoners are not denied access to basic need such as food, warmth, or exercise.
Zion ties humor to the key messages in his presentation.
Most presentations are about sharing information and facts with an audience. Needless to say, that can get dull, dry and boring pretty quickly. Humor is a great way to spice up your presentation and keep your audience entertained and engaged.
With the right amount of humor at the right times, you’ll not only keep your audience happy, but increase their interest in your topic, too.
To learn more about Humor click here;
brainly.com/question/11513133
#SPJ4
<em>In the case of 1959 Tinker versus Des Moines students started a protest against the Vietnam War using an armband, but the school threat to suspend them if they wore the armband, the parents of the children began a legal fight with the school, as a result the parents of the children took the case to Supreme Court which ruled a decision that guarantees and protects the right of free speech and self-expression of students in public school.</em>
<em>This decision allows now the right to free speech and self-expression, it affect the students in a lot of positive ways, one simple way it can be seeming per example is in the fact that this decision prevents schools from prohibiting nowadays students from doing things as wearing dyed colorful hair or piercing and protesting in the school.</em>
