<span>the answer to this question is: The revenue sacrificed represents a very small share of the show's revenue
The only way the show can still earn profit by selling cheap tickets is if they're gaining additional revenue from another streatm of income, such as selling merchandise on the concerts, providing beer and snacks, or selling autograph and photos</span>
Answer:
$80 million
Explanation:
We know that
Multiplier = (1) ÷ (1 - marginal propensity to consume)
= (1) ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= (1) ÷ (0.25)
= 4
Now the GDP would increase by
= Increase in Investment spending × multiplier effect
= $20 billion × 4
= $80 million increase
We simply multiplied the investment spending increase with the multiplier effect
<u>Available Options Are:</u>
A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
B. Change the role hierarchy and put all of the sales managers in the US and Canada in the same role.
C. Create criteria-based sharing rules to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
D. Create a public group and include all accounts of the same segment and grant access through a permission set.
Answer:
Option A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles
Explanation:
This owner based sharing will allow the sales manager to access information but he will not be able to alter information which gives a right to access information only. This sharing of information will resolve the sales manager concern and will also him and other sales manager to use this information to make informed decisions. Hence Option A is correct.
Putting in the same role would manipulate the data because the data entered by each sales manager will not be distinguished easily and thus the system will not produce meaningful results. Hence Option B is also incorrect.
Option C is also incorrect because allowing access on meeting certain criteria would result in restriction of data. Thus it is not the solution.
Option D allowing access to all the data would not be necessary as some of the data might require protection and also that it might be meaningless to have private accounts. Thus the option D is incorrect.
The answer in this question is the foot-in-the-door phenomenon which is the first one in the choices. The results of this experiment that the researchers conducted support the foot-in-the-door phenomenon. The foot-in-the-door phenomenon is one that is supported by the result of this experiment.
Answer:
1.
Dec 31 Rent expense $3450 Dr
Prepaid Rent $3450 Cr
2.
Oct 1 Prepaid Rent $13800 Dr
Cash $13800 Cr
3.
Year end balances at 31 December:
Rent Expense = $3450
Prepaid Rent = $10350
Explanation:
Assumption: The year end for the business in on 31 December.
1.
The rent is paid in advance thus it is an asset. On 31 December the adjusting entry will be made under the accrual principle to match the current period's rent expense and record it in the period to which it belongs to. Thus we will credit the rent expense for 3 months i.e. October, November and December. We will credit the asset account that is Prepaid Rent.
2.
The prepayment of rent is creating an asset account in the title of prepaid rent. The entry would be to record the asset prepaid rent by the full amount of the rent prepaid and credit the other asset account through which the payment is being made.
3.
The adjusted year end balance for rent expense will be the rent expense paid for this period that is $1150 * 3 = 3450
The balance in the prepaid rent account after adjusting the rent expense will be,
Prepaid rent = 13800 - 3450 = $10350
