Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
Moving a balloon across a wool cloth is an example of a contact force
Stephanie, an adolescent who has witnessed a fantastic deal of conflict among her parents, will most probably: enjoy higher levels.
Adolescence is the section of life between adolescence and maturity, from a long time 10 to 19. it's far a completely unique level of human development and a crucial time for laying the principles of precise health. children experience fast physical, cognitive and psychosocial increases.
Formative years are the duration of transition between formative years and adulthood. youngsters who are getting into adolescence are going via many modifications (bodily, highbrow, character, and social developmental). adolescence begins at puberty, which now happens in advance, on average, than in the past.
Early life, these years from puberty to adulthood, can be kind of divided into three degrees: early adolescence, generally a while 11 to fourteen; middle adolescence, ages fifteen to seventeen; and late adolescence, a while eighteen to twenty-one.
Learn more about adolescence here: brainly.com/question/1956818
#SPJ4
The word or phrase to fill into the gap is the "Ku Klux Klan", an extreme right organization calling for what they would call a "purification" of the US-American society.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.