Answer:
It is a research that shows that what influences the level of positive emotions in one country could be that which influences the negative expression in another country.
Explanation:
This research is premised on the factors responsible for individual expressions in different countries.
What defines ones happiness in one country could be that which brings about unhappiness. For instance, teachers in Finland are well paid and it gives them happiness and fulfillment. But the reverse is the case for teachers in most developing countries whose wages is not commensurate with the time spent work.
Patience is key. you have to wait for the right moment and if you want to get closer you must zig zag and take a few steps at a time.
Answer:
B) Melissa had weak interpersonal and networking skills to run the project.
Explanation:
Interpersonal skills are described as an individual's maneuver and behaviors that he or she uses to interact with those of the other person effectively. In business, it is being used to define as an employee's capability to work in a better way and includes listening and communication related to deportment and attitude.
Networking Skills are described as a phenomenon that helps an individual to improve and develop a skill set. It includes a good listening tendency that is responsible for validating value towards the other person's opinion and therefore shows respect.
The best theory to explain this reaction is the Lazarus theory of emotion. This theory indicated that emotions have a cognitive process; the emotions are valuations about the situations, depends on what we think about the situations to feel a determined emotion.
I hope my answer can help you.
Answer:
C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
Explanation:
A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct
