Each tire is worth $134.79 :)
Answer: 1 widget per dollar
Explanation:
The weekly productivity level for this operation will be calculated thus:
Output = 8000 widgets per week.
Input = Labor Cost + Material Cost
= (5 × 40 × $15) + (100 × $50)
= $3000 + $5000
= $8000
Productivity = Output / Input
= $8000 / $8000
= 1 widget per dollar
Answer:
8.66%
Explanation:
The computation of the rate of return for the investor in the fund is as follows:
= (Net assets at the end + dividend per share - nav at the beginning of the year) ÷ (nav at the beginning of the year)
where,
Net assets at the end is
= $203 million + $203 million × 7% - ($217.21 million × 0.75%)
= $203 million + $14.21 million - $1.6291 million
= $217.21 million - $1.6291 million
= $215.58093 million
Dividend per share is
= $5 million ÷ 10 million shares
= 0.5
Nav at the beginning of the year is
= $203 million ÷ 10 million shares
= $20.3
Now the rate of return is
= ($215,.58093 + 0.5 - $20.3) ÷ ($20.3)
= 8.66%
Answer:
By influencing incentives, taxes can affect both supply and demand factors. Reducing marginal tax rates on wages and salaries, for example, can induce people to work more. Expanding the earned income tax credit can bring more low-skilled workers into the labor force.
I think it might help you
Answer:
A). The demand curve looked by the flawlessly serious firms are splendidly versatile this is a result of the items selling in the ideal rivalry. The items are indistinguishable so no firm has power over the market cost, in the event that one firm builds the cost of the item the purchasers will quickly move to the result of different firms on the grounds that the items are indistinguishable. No firm has the motivator lessen the cost of their item. So the interest bend would be a level straight line corresponding to the X pivot, this demonstrates the interest is splendidly versatile. A cost increment will bring the amount requested to zero.
B). The monopolists is just the single vendor in the market, so he can charge any value he needs, yet the amount requested will be relied on the value he charges. For instance in the event that he charges a significant expense the amount demanded will be very less and the other way around. So the monopolist is capable sell more at lower costs just, the descending inclining request bend shows the negative connection between the cost and the amount requested.
C). In the ideal rivalry there is consummately flexible interest so the MR curve is likewise the interest curve of the firm. For the monopolist the MR curve lies underneath the interest curve, as the costs go bring down the MR decreases.
