Answer:
<u><em></em></u>
- <em>At the end of the first compounding period: </em><u>$1,050.00</u>
- <em>At the end of the second compounding period: </em><u>$1,102.50</u>
Explanation:
<u />
<u>1. First period:</u>
- <em>APR = 10%</em> = 0.1 compounded semi-annually.
- <em>Semi-annually compound interest</em>: 0.1 / 2 = 0.05
- Interest earned at the end of the first period: $1,000 × 0.05 = $50.00
- Amount in the accoun at the end of the first period:
$1,000.00 + $50.00 = $1,050.00
<u>2. Second period</u>
- Amount in the account beginning the second period: $1,050.00
- Semi-annually compound interest: 0.1 / 2 = 0.05
- Interest earned in the second period:
$1,050.00 × 0.05 = $50.00 = $52.50
- Amount in the account at the end of the second period:
$1,050.00 + $52.50 = $1,102.50
Answer:
$250,000
Explanation:
Since the purchase cost of an old equipment is already incurred and it does not have any kind of impact in decision making so this cost would be considered as the sunk cost i.e. $250,000
The operating cost of old & new equipment would be relevant for calculating the annual cost savings and the current selling value of the old equipment would also be relevant as salvage value
Therefore $250,000 would be considered
Answer:
$22,820
Explanation:
Calculation to determine Determine the present value of the par value of the bonds.
Discount rate =8%/2
Discount rate= 4%
Present value factor of 20 periods at 4%= ( 1 / 1.04^20 )
Present value factor of 20 periods at 4%=0.4564
Using this formula
Present value of the par value of the bond = Future value of the bond x Present value factor =
Let plug in the formula
Present value of the par value of the bond=$50,000 x 0.4564
Present value of the par value of the bond = $22,820
Therefore the present value of the par value of the bonds is $22,820
Answer:
a. $60.
Explanation:
While computing the relevant cost in case of special order only the variable manufacturing cost is to be considered as it will be changed in special order case.
And the other cot like - fixed manufacturing, variable & fixed selling, traceable fixed administrative cost, etc are not relevant as it remains constant
These costs are not useful for decision making. Hence, it is to be ignored
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.