The inquisition is the name of the system of church courts that used secret testimony and torture to root out heresy and force non-Catholics to convert to Catholicism.
The Inquisition was an investigative institution established within the government system of the Catholic Church to root out public heresy committed by baptized Christians. The Inquisition begun formally in the 12th-century and its primary function is to probe and expose Christians and church leaders that refused to accept the church’s principle or beliefs.
Answer:
The correct answers are:
Qualitative; quantitative
Explanation:
According to Piaget's theory, the cognitive approach in children changes in a qualitative way since human beings develop their capacities in different ways as they grow and get mature, processing the acquired information in different ways as well. He says it happens in a qualitative manner, more than a process of accumulation of information where more and more information is stored.
On the other hand according to the information-processing approach which is mainly adopted by cognitive psychologists, the knowledge acquisition is mainly based on a quantitative model, in which information is processed according to the number of experiences and storage of information that will be used when necessary. This model is generally compared to that of a computer in which an amount of information can be stored to use later.
Answer:
C) Quotas
Explanation:
I took the test and got it right
Hope this helps :)
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST
Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
