Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Bob has to own his land for 18 years if the price is increasing at the rate of 6% per year.
Given that land was bought by Bob for $16390, the price is increasing at the rate of 6%, price of land today is $46817.
We are required to find the time for which Bob need to own the land so that the price of the land is $46817 today.
Compounding means calculating amount on the principal and the amount added interest.
Rate of increasing the price of land be 6%.
Price when Bob bought the land=$16390.
Price of land today=$46817.
It is like compounding of interest and the sum is calculated as under:
S=P*
In the above equation P is theamount at beginning,r is rate of increasing and n is the number of years.
46817=16390
46817/16390=
=2.8564
=
(Approximately)
From both the sides we will get n=18.
Hence Bob has to own his land for 18 years if the price is increasing at the rate of 6% per year.
Learn more about compounding at brainly.com/question/2449900
#SPJ4
Liability insurance or legal liability
Answer:
$34,100
Explanation:
The interest on the installment note for the first year is a function of both the face value of the note and interest rate of 11%
Interest expense on the first annual payment=$310,000*11%
Interest expense on the first annual payment=$34,100
The amount principal repayment in respect of the first annual payment is the amount of payment which is $52,639 minus the interest portion of the payment.
The Principal portion of the first payment=$52,639-$34,100=$18,539
Answer:
life insurance net payment cost index
Explanation:
The accidental death benefit is referred to as a payment due to the sole beneficiary of an accidental death insurance policy. The accidental death benefit mostly is an amount paid which adds to the standard benefit payable if
and only if the insured died of natural causes e.g old age, earthquake or tsunami etc.
Depending on the issuer of the policy, the accidental death benefit may extend up to a year after the initial accident occurred, so long as the accident led to the insured's death.
