Answer and explanation;
Several changes would undoubtedly have surprised a knowledgeable observer, including;
- the emergence of Islam;
- the revival of China and Western Europe;
-the collapse of the Byzantine Empire;
-the emergence of Russia and the spread of Christianity into that region;
-the emergence of states in Southeast Asia;
-the emergence of Japan;
-the emergence of powerful empires in West Africa.
However, some features would still be recognizable, such as;
- the persistence of Paleolithic, agricultural village, and herding societies;
-the continuance, albeit at a more intense rate, of long-distance commerce and exchange;
-the persistence of broad cultural traditions, especially in the Mesoamerican, Andean, Chinese, European, and Indian civilizations.
The main world leaders at the time were
Hitler - Germany
Franklin D. Roosevelt - USA
Mussolini - italy
Churchill - Britain
stalin- russia
Answer:
The German nightmare was a war on two fronts. Historically, Russia needed time to ‘mobilize’, that is, to call up reservists, equip them, and assign them to their regiments and platoons. So the logical way of operating was to attack and defeat the French first, before attacking the Russians. But in 1914 the Russians cheated; they mobilised before they announced it so their army was in the field quite a long time before the Germans expected it — and the dreaded war on two fronts materialised. The Germans were lucky in that their effective commander Ludendorff (who was technically 2ic) moved his troops about by train, so they were not already exhausted by a long and hurried march and were able to throw the Russians back into complete confusion and surrender.
So the Russians were defeated but not mortally injured, the French came close to defeat but just managed to stabilise a front, and the ‘despicable English Army’ saved itself from disaster by the narrowest Of margins.
Four years of continuous bloody slaughter were assured.
Glad I can Help
Federalism refers to the supremacy of he powers of state governments
The first alternative is correct (A).
<u>The marginal cost is a microeconomic measure that aims to measure the effectiveness of the production of a given good by a company.
</u>
The marginal cost content is simple. Marginal cost is cost if you produce ONE more unit of good. For example, if I have a firm that produces chocolate and my daily output is 10 bars of chocolate per day. The marginal cost is how much it costs to produce one unit more than I normally produce, that is, the cost of the 11th bar.
The graph of pie production, initially the marginal cost is decreasing, up to the third pie. From the fourth pie, the marginal cost starts to increase steadily. This is because the company has a limited production structure, that is, three pies are produced efficiently by employees and inputs. However, as production increases, more employees must be hired, and if space is limited, each employee's productivity decreases. For example, if the company had 1 employee who produced up to 3 pies. When you hired another one, the efficiency has decreased because there is only one mixer, that is, while one employee produces the other, he has to wait.
In this way, marginal cost serves as a measure of an enterprise's efficient production rate.
