Answer:
Sublimation is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Reactance.
Explanation:
This is simply explained the juror's motives and doings which directly tells that inadmissible evidence violates due process, and legal evidentiary standards dictate that a curative instruction is appropriate to minimize the risk that the jury is misled by the unacceptable information.
Psychologists posit that jurors are likely to follow the prescribed corrective action only if motivated and able to do so. Research shows that jurors do attempt to use information in a fair manner and to align their decisions with the judge’s instructions. However, juror motivation also may be affected by reactance resistance to a judge’s admonition when it is seen as constraining effective deliberation unless the judge can offer a clear and compelling reason as to why the information is unreliable or irrelevant to the case. Jurors may resist giving up information that they find probative.
Members of congress often resist taking action to limit presidential power because if they belong to the same party, they would not want to interfere with the actions of the president, for sharing the same ideals and the same political objectives, usually the majority is sought in the congress to act with greater freedom with respect to the state policy proposed by the president.
Answer:
noncompensatory
Explanation:
Beverly wants to take a cruise with her children. She selects one with a daycare that will ensure her children are well cared for, even though the onboard activities for adults on that cruise are less exciting than on other cruises. Beverly used a noncompensatory decision rule.
