Answer:
it does not measure quality-of-life factors ; it does not account for distribution of wealth ; it fails to measure non monetary (home production) activities
Explanation:
Real GDP is the total value of goods & services produced in an economy, during a period of time. But it is not correct measure of welfare level.
- It does not measure non monetary production, like hobby production eg kitchen gardening, self made paintings, music. But, they increase welfare
- It does not take into consideration the qualitative factors affecting welfare like pollution, crime & literacy. Externalities cause extra benefit or harm to welfare level, but are excluded from GDP.
- Inequitable distribution of per capita (average) GDP increases rich poor standard of living divide. So, the distribution effect ignored make GDP an inapt measure of average welfare level.
Real GDP adjusts the value of goods & services for price change (Inflation), it is a correct measure of increase in real flow of goods & services. GDP & health positive correlation is a favouring point for GDP as a measure of welfare. So, these options are incorrect.
Answer: True
Explanation: The funding goal is the least amount you need to start on a project and pay for rewards if you've offered any and the very concept of funding goal should come from the campaign objective. You are expected to decide on whether your campaign should come from a financial standpoint or marketing standpoint. It is true that the fact that Megan Grassell exceeded her funding goals is a good indication that her product will be popular.
Answer:
<em><u>It would generate a financial disadvantage for 62,800</u></em>
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-&continued&discontinued&differential\\Sales&351,900&0&-351,900\\Variable&-260,100&0&260,100\\Contribution&91,800&0&-91,800\\Fixed&-103,000&-74,000&29,000\\total&-11,200&-74,000&-62,800\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D-%26continued%26discontinued%26differential%5C%5CSales%26351%2C900%260%26-351%2C900%5C%5CVariable%26-260%2C100%260%26260%2C100%5C%5CContribution%2691%2C800%260%26-91%2C800%5C%5CFixed%26-103%2C000%26-74%2C000%2629%2C000%5C%5Ctotal%26-11%2C200%26-74%2C000%26-62%2C800%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
It would generate a financial disadvantage for 62,800
Because the product, while is having a loss, their contribution cover is enought to cover at least the avoidable fixed cost.
Answer: It is less severe than a material weakness
Explanation:
A SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY is described as a deficiency or an amalgamation of deficiencies that are NOT as severe as a MATERIAL WEAKNESS ( which is quite serious and must be reported to the Audit Committee and be reflected in the financial statements) but still important enough for those people in charge of the company's financial records to take notice.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Typically, some resources are better suited for producing one good than another, which means that there are diminishing returns when moving such resources away from producing what they are best suited for.
Explanation:
A production possibility curve shows the different combinations of two goods that can be produced using all the given resources. Since resources are scarce, to increase the production of one good we need to decrease production of the other.
But resources are specialized and cannot be perfectly substituted between their two uses. So as we go on increasing production of one good the opportunity cost of sacrificing its alternative goes on increasing.
Because of this increasing opportunity cost the shape of the frontier is downward sloping, bent outwards and concave to the origin.
