Economic Anthropology says that individual thought and behavior are best understood as rational, self-interested decision-making.
Economic anthropology is always in dialogue (whether implicitly or explicitly) with the discipline of economics. However, there are several important differences between the two disciplines. Perhaps most importantly, economic anthropology encompasses the production, exchange, consumption, meaning, and uses of both material objects and immaterial services, whereas contemporary economics focuses primarily on market exchanges. In addition, economic anthropologists dispute the idea that all individual thoughts, choices, and behaviors can be understood through a narrow lens of rational, self-interested decision-making. When asked why people choose to buy a new shirt rather than shoes, anthropologists, and increasingly economists, look beyond the motives of Homo economicus to determine how social, cultural, political, and institutional forces shape humans’ everyday decisions
Learn more about Anthropology here: brainly.com/question/1799013
#SPJ4
Answer:
Venezuela's vegan <u>travelling</u><u> </u>to cities in the mid-1900's for the jobs and opportunities they offered.
first amendment the right to practice of religion and freedom of expression from government interference
the 15 and 19 and 26 give the right to vote
Answer:
bicameral system, also called bicameralism, a system of government in which the legislature comprises two houses. The modern bicameral system dates back to the beginnings of constitutional government in 17th-century England and to the later 18th century on the continent of Europe and in the United States.
Because the independent nations had different policies which made it harder for the british to support the other people of the democracy. They were more "challnged".
