1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
3 years ago
6

Eleven-month-old Luis watches as his mother comes in and out of his bedroom while she is putting away laundry. Luis does not get

upset when his mother leaves the room since he seems to know that his mother is still in the house, even if he cannot see her. Luis is demonstrating ____.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mademuasel [1]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Luis is demonstrating Object Permanence .

Explanation:

Object Permanence is a term that describes how a child understands that an object is existing even though the child can no longer see or hear it.  

Usually, infants at a certain age do get upset and cry whenever an object has been hidden from them because they are yet to attain the understanding that an object continues to exist even when they can no longer see or hear from it.

On his part, eleven-month-old Luis has reached a stage where he understands that his mom is somewhere close to him even though he can't see or hear from her.

You might be interested in
A recently widowed person tells her grandson, i keep going over grandpa's final days and hours. sometimes i find myself searchin
Sav [38]
<span>The right answer is normal, especially in the first months of bereavement. It is normal for people to have symptoms similar to depression after losing a loved one; Depressive mood and a negative outlook on the future, mainly in the first months. <span>There is no consensus about the months that a duel should last and each person faces it in different ways, however, if the duel lasts for more than a year it is likely that the person will take on professional help.

I hope my answer can help you. 
</span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Reformation impact the Scientific Revolution. Give two reasons and explain.
kompoz [17]

Answer:

On 31 October 1517, as legend has it, renegade monk Martin Luther nailed a document to the door of All Saints' Church in Wittenberg, Germany. The Ninety-five Theses marked the beginning of the Reformation, the first major break in the unity of Christianity since 1054. Luther proclaimed a radical new theology: salvation by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, the ultimate authority not of the Church, but of the Bible. By 1520, he had rejected the authority of the pope. Lutherans and followers of French reformer John Calvin found themselves engaged in bitter wars against Catholicism that lasted for a century and a half.

This age of religious warfare was also the age of the scientific revolution: Nicolaus Copernicus's On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres (1543), Tycho Brahe's Introduction to the New Astronomy (1588), Johannes Kepler's New Astronomy (1609), Galileo Galilei's telescopic discoveries (1610), the experiments with air pressure and the vacuum by Blaise Pascal (1648) and Robert Boyle (1660), and Isaac Newton's Principia (1687).

Were the Reformation and this revolution merely coincident, or did the Reformation somehow facilitate or foster the new science, which rejected traditional authorities such as Aristotle and relied on experiments and empirical information? Suppose Martin Luther had never existed; suppose the Reformation had never taken place. Would the history of science have been fundamentally different? Would there have been no scientific revolution? Would we still be living in the world of the horse and cart, the quill pen and the matchlock firearm? Can we imagine a Catholic Newton, or is Newton's Protestantism somehow fundamental to his science?

The key book on this subject was published in 1938 by Robert Merton, the great US sociologist who went on to invent terms that have become part of everyday speech, such as 'role model', 'unanticipated consequence' and 'self-fulfilling prophecy'. Merton's first book, Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England, attracted little attention initially. But in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, historians of science endlessly and inconclusively debated what they called the Merton thesis: that Puritanism, the religion of the founders of the New England colonies, had fostered scientific enquiry, and that this was precisely why England, where the religion had motivated a civil war, had a central role in the construction of modern science.

Those debates have fallen quiet. But it is still widely argued by historians of science that the Protestant religion and the new science were inextricably intertwined, as Protestantism turned away from the spirituality of Catholicism and fostered a practical engagement with the world, exemplified in the idea that a person's occupation was their vocation. Merton was following in the footsteps of German sociologist Max Weber, who argued that Protestantism had led to capitalism.

I disagree. First, plenty of great sixteenth- and seventeenth-century scientists were Catholics, including Copernicus, Galileo and Pascal. Second, one of the most striking features of the new science was how easily it passed back and forth between Catholics and Protestants. At the height of the religious wars, two Protestant astronomers were appointed one after another as mathematicians to the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor: first Brahe, then Kepler. Louis XIV, who expelled the Protestants from France in 1685, had previously hired Protestants such as Christiaan Huygens for his Academy of Sciences. The experiments of Pascal, a devout Catholic, were quickly copied in England by the devoutly Protestant Boyle. The Catholic Church banned Copernicanism, but was quick to change its mind in the light of Newton's discoveries. And third, if we can point to Protestant communities that seem to have produced more than their share of great scientists, we can also point to Protestant societies where the new science did not flourish until later — Scotland, for example.

Discovery and dissemination

What made the scientific revolution possible were three developments. A new confidence in the possibility of discovery was the first: there was no word for discovery in European languages before exploration uncovered the Americas. The printing press was the second. It brought about an information revolution: instead of commenting on a few canonical texts, intellectuals learnt to navigate whole libraries of information. In the process, they invented the modern idea of the fact — reliable information that could be checked and tested. Finally, there was the new claim by mathematicians to be better at understanding the world than philosophers, a claim that was grounded in their development of the experimental method.

8 0
3 years ago
Lawrence is studying a psychologist who broke ground with her compelling research into the environmental and cultural factors th
djyliett [7]

Answer:

Then Lawrence is studying Karen Horney.

Explanation:

  • Karen Horney practiced later in his career as a psychoanalyst in the US.
  • Sexuality and instinct orientation theories being the center of her argument, she questioned a number of the traditional views of the Freudian.
  • Karen horney takes the credit as the founder of feminist psychology when he made response to the idea of Sigmund Freud based on his theory of penis envy.
8 0
3 years ago
The case of hugo zacchini, the "human cannonball," was an oddity in appropriation law because
Digiron [165]
I think the answer is the appropriation occurred in a news program.

8 0
3 years ago
Mariah takes off her ring and places it on her desk while she works. Without her knowledge or consent, her coworker Nita picks u
tigry1 [53]

Answer: Larceny

Explanation:

Larceny is a prevalent crime which occurs when an individual takes someone's property without their consent with an intent of not returning it.

It commonly referred to as theft.

Larceny Definition: Elements of the Crime

Things that need to be proven for someone to be convicted of larceny

-Illegal obtaining someone else's property

- The property should have taken without the owner's consent.

- The intention of the taker is to not return the property to the owner but make it their permanently.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the country that controlled Florida at one time?
    12·2 answers
  • How do you use Bill of rights in a sentence
    7·1 answer
  • To which type of committee is a newly introduced bill sent?
    10·1 answer
  • To quickly recall information, Freud maintained that we use the __________ level of consciousness.
    9·2 answers
  • What are 10 goods the Phoenicians traded?
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think farming did not develop extensively in the Arctic and the subarctic regions?
    9·2 answers
  • Solve and get brainliest!!<br>please be sure of your answer!!!​
    5·2 answers
  • do you still vary in terms of what is acceptable or what has been practiced nowadays here in our locality?why?​
    10·1 answer
  • By the ninth century, _________ became an economic and religious force in West and North Africa. The change greatly influenced J
    14·1 answer
  • I don't support the Black Lives Matter because they are always acting crazy abt things for no reason.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!