Answer:
The correct answer is c :
E-readiness
Explanation:
E-readiness refers to group, individual or government capacity of preparedness to participate in the electronic world. The level of maturity is determined by the individual information and communications technology infrastructure and to use the information gotten through it provided the information is adequate. The information gotten is channel towards sustainable development.
Though, the measures to determine the electronic readiness of an individual or country depend on the area of interest. The significant factors in measuring E- readiness include
- Communications technology and information
- Level of preparedness of individual or government to harness the use of ICT for feasible development.
In the case presented in the question, Jerome demonstrates E-readiness while Charles does not. Jerome has a better understanding of the fact that not all information is correct; therefore have a clear knowledge of how information works in the electronic world. However Charles makes use of the information without scrutiny and it shows he does not understand how the electronic world works.
LEAR MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- electronic world
- individual or government
- communications technology
- information
- e-readiness
American colonist were angry because they werent getting their rights and they were being taxed to higg
I think it would be b because liquids are runny but i’m not sure
Answer:
correct answer is perceived proximity
Explanation:
correct answer is perceived proximity because Perceived proximity is the dyadic and asymmetric construct
it is define as 1 person perception that how close or far the other person,
and here we focus on dyadic because if people form perception of specific in other in course of work
and perceived proximity is also known only for focal person and Perception proximity is naturally asymmetric
so here Feeling of nearness or presence of other with across a distance is called perceived proximity
Answer:
The concept of sustainable development can be interpreted in many different ways, but at its core is an approach to development that looks to balance different, and often competing, needs against an awareness of the environmental, social and economic limitations we face as a society.
All too often, development is driven by one particular need, without fully considering the wider or future impacts. We are already seeing the damage this kind of approach can cause, from large-scale financial crises caused by irresponsible banking, to changes in global climate resulting from our dependence on fossil fuel-based energy sources. The longer we pursue unsustainable development, the more frequent and severe its consequences are likely to become, which is why we need to take action now.