A solution that will help in the agency problem in terms of
publiclyminus – held corporations is by through having bonuses in the company
or organization that will be based on primarily the short term results that
they have acquired in the company.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Probability distribution are statistical function that shows all the possible outcomes of a random variable within a given range of values.
a) The mean (
) of a probability distribution of a discrete random variable is:
![\bar x=\Sigma\ [xP(x)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbar%20x%3D%5CSigma%5C%20%5BxP%28x%29%5D)
= (0 * 0.8) + (1 * 0.15) + (2 * 0.04) + (3 * 0.01) = 0.26
b) The standard deviation (σ) of a probability distribution of a discrete random variable is:
![\sigma=\sqrt{ \Sigma\ [(x-\bar x)^2*P(x)]}\\\\\sigma=\sqrt{(0-0.26)^2*0.8+(1-0.26)^2*0.15+(2-0.26)^2*0.04+(3-0.26)^2*0.01} \\\\\sigma=0.577](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csigma%3D%5Csqrt%7B%20%5CSigma%5C%20%5B%28x-%5Cbar%20x%29%5E2%2AP%28x%29%5D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Csigma%3D%5Csqrt%7B%280-0.26%29%5E2%2A0.8%2B%281-0.26%29%5E2%2A0.15%2B%282-0.26%29%5E2%2A0.04%2B%283-0.26%29%5E2%2A0.01%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Csigma%3D0.577)
Answer:
(a) 10.4%; 16.73%
(b) 6.33%
Explanation:
Given that,
Wages paid to the workers in 2016 = $25 per hour
Price level in 2016 = 241
Wages paid to the workers in 2017 = $41 per hour
Price level in 2017 = 245
Real wage rate in 2016:
= (Nominal wages ÷ Price level) × 100
= ($25 ÷ 241) × 100
= 0.104 × 100
= 10.4%
Real wage rate in 2017:
= (Nominal wages ÷ Price level) × 100
= ($41 ÷ 245) × 100
= 0.1673 × 100
= 16.73%
Therefore, the real wage increase received by these workers in 2017 is calculated as follows:
= Real wage rate in 2017 - Real wage rate in 2016
= 16.73% - 10.4%
= 6.33%
Hence, these workers do get a raise between the two years.
Answer:
The correct option is A, Samantha weed and Adam will rake because these are the goods each has a comparative advantage in.
Explanation:
The opportunity formula comes handy in this case, which is given below:
opportunity cost formula=what one sacrifices/what one gains
If Samantha were to weed flower beds, opportunity cost is computed thus:
Opportunity cost of Samantha weeding flower beds=8/4= 2 bags of leaves raked
The opportunity of Adam weeding flower beds=25/5 =5 bags of leaves raked.
In a nutshell ,if Samantha weeds flowers they would lose 2 bags of leaves raked while if Adam were to do so same, they would lose 5 bags of leaves raked, conclusively Samantha should weed flower beds since she has lower opportunity, higher comparative advantage
Answer:
Land (Dr.) $1,800,000
Land Improvements $540,000
Building 2 $660,000
Building 1 demolish expense $346,400
Land grading expense $187,400
Building 3 construction cost $2,242,000
Land 2 improvement cost $168,000
Cash (Cr.) $22,143,800
Explanation:
Mitzu Co. has paid lump sum amount for 2 buildings and land. The building 1 has no value so its value is considered as zero and all the amount will be attributed to land and building 2. The company has also incurred costs for the demolish of building 1 which will be charged in the books of accounts as one off expense.
