1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mihalych1998 [28]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following was an important message in The Federalist papers in favor of the Constitution?

History
1 answer:
Inga [223]3 years ago
8 0

Your answer would be A "there would be one-house legislature"

You might be interested in
List down 5 pros and 5 cons of having laws.<br><br><br><br> C.L.E
klemol [59]

Answer:

5,5

Explanation:

5 pros:

1)Uniformity and Certainty:

Law provides Uniformity and certainty to the administration of justice. The same law has to be applied in all cases. There can be no distinction between one case and another case if the facts are the same.

2)Protection against arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions:

If the administration of Justice is left completely to the individual discretion of a judge, improper motives and dishonest opinions could affect the distribution of justice. Law as Fixed Principles of the law of justice avoids the danger of arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions.

3)Freedom from errors of individual judgement:

The fixed principles of law protect the administration of justice from the errors of individual judgement. Commenting on this aspect of law, the Greek Philosopher Aristotle observed that "to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden." This, in other words, means that "law is not always necessarily wise but on the whole and in the long run it is wiser than those who administer it".

4)Reliability :

There is another advantage of law is its reliability. It is more reliable than the individual judgements of the Courts. The human mind is fallible and judges are no exception. The wisdom of the legislature which represents the wisdom of the people is safer and more reliable means of protection than the momentary fancy of the individual judge.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

5 cons:

1)The rigidity of law:

An Ideal legal system keeps on changing according to the changing needs of the people. But because of the rigidity of law, it is unable to keep pace with the fast-changing society. There is always a gap between the advancement of society and the legal system prevailing in it. The lack of flexibility in law results in hardship and injustice to the people.

2)Conservative Nature:

Another disadvantage of law is that its Conservative Nature. Law is conservative in its approach. The Bar and Bench are generally conservative in their approach to the dispensation of justice. The result is is that very often the law is static. This is not conducive to a progressive society.

3)Formalism:

The Law suffers from excessive formalism greater emphasis laid on the form of law rather than its substance. Undue formalism causes unnecessary delay in dispensation of justice.

4)Complexity :

Another disadvantage of law is its Complexity. It is true that every law effort is made to make law as simple as possible but it is not possible to make every law simple. That is due to the Complex nature of modern society.Commenting on the advantages and disadvantages of law Salmond observed that if the benefits of the law are great, the evils too are not small. Be that it may, it cannot be denied law serves as an effective instrument of social change. Law must change to the changing condition.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

3 0
1 year ago
Who was the 19th president of the United States of America?
krok68 [10]
Rutherford B. Hayes. You know you can google these kinds of simple questions, right? It's much faster and more reliable.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Philippines campaign reveal about Japan, whom the United States fought in the pacific during world war 2
ioda

Answer:

The Philippine campaign showed Japan's aggressiveness and perseverance towards battles.

Explanation:

The Philippine campaign showed that the Japanese government, even at a disadvantage, would not so easily win the victory of its enemies of war. This is because the Japanese army has shown itself to be aggressive and persevering in its fight against American forces, even if defeat was almost guaranteed. This showed that Japanese soldiers saw the battlefield as something that represented their honor, for this reason, they would rather die fighting than surrender to the enemy army.

3 0
2 years ago
List the factors which brought The first world War?​
yanalaym [24]

1. Friends don’t let friends fight alone

A tangled web of strong political alliances among nations meant that most great powers felt obliged to help their partners once war was declared.

After the murder of an Austrian Archduke by Serbian assassins, Austria-Hungary prepared for war against Serbia, which was allied with Russia.

Once Russia mobilized, Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, declared war on both Russia and Russia’s ally, France. Great Britain and its empire, sympathetic to France, declared war on Germany (Canada was not consulted).

Alliances originally intended as defensive pacts ended up looking threatening to outsiders. This perilous network of allegiances is an accepted part of all narratives about the First World War. German historian Andreas Hilgruber was one of many who showed how dangerous and costly all of these alliances were.

2. Armed to the teeth

Europe in 1914 was armed to the teeth. Vast fleets of warships were being constructed, conscription was implemented in most of the great powers to allow large armies to be kept in reserve, weapons and ammunition were stockpiled, and detailed war plans were made.

The impact of the proliferation of the instruments of war as a cause of the outbreak of the conflict was highlighted by David Stevenson’s Armaments and the Coming of War (1996). A large army spoiling for a fight may well seek one out.

3. Capitalist imperialism

During the First World War, Vladimir Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, wrote an essay entitled Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), in which he laid out the foundation of his own philosophy of communism.

He believed that the war was the product of capitalist financial monopolies within states, which created national rivalries and led the great powers into a destructive conflict over access to raw materials and undeveloped markets.

Others since have blamed imperialism itself and commercial interests.

4. War on a tight schedule

A.J.P. Taylor, one of the 20th century’s great historians, argued in War by Timetable (1969) that in 1914, thanks to relatively new transportation (railroad) and communications (telegraph and telephone) technologies, every European power believed that the ability to mobilize their armies faster than their neighbours would by itself deter war.

Every power drafted elaborate mobilization timetables so that they could outrace their potential opponents. When the crisis of 1914 occurred, none of the leaders really wanted war, according to Taylor, but each felt they had to mobilize faster than the others or lose the advantage.

They became the victims of their own logistical preparations, and Europe slid unwillingly but relentlessly into war. Barbara Tuchman’s book The Guns of August (1962) similarly identified the dangers of technology in causing conflicts to escalate rapidly.

5. Blame Germany

In the Treaty of Versailles that officially ended the war, Germany was made to accept the blame for causing the conflict, and after that German governments spent decades denying their sole responsibility.

They convinced many people, but after the Second World War, German historian Fritz Fischer looked into previously-classified archives for the first time. Fischer concluded in his book German War Aims in the First World War (1961) that Imperial Germany had deliberately provoked a general war as part of a policy of conquest much like that undertaken by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany 20 years later.

Fischer’s conclusions remain controversial to this day.

6. No, blame Britain

The idea that Britain caused the war was the live grenade that firebrand historian Niall Ferguson lobbed into the debate when he wrote The Pity of War (1999), though Paul Schroeder had put forward a similar argument earlier.

Ferguson claimed that not only did British statesmen encourage France and Russia to oppose Germany, but that Britain’s own intervention turned a regional European brawl into a global war.

The British may not have directly started it, according to Ferguson, but they were liable for greatly expanding the scope of the war and making it drag on as long as it did.

7. People being people

Canadian historian Margaret Macmillan has published a major book, The War That Ended Peace (2013), which presents a synthesis of many different factors: alliances and power politics; reckless diplomacy; ethnic nationalism; and, most of all, the personal character and relationships of the almost uncountable number of historical figures who had a hand in the coming of war.

Her work helps to highlight the fact that for all the great and powerful forces that seemed to grind the world inexorably into war in 1914, everything ultimately came down to the beliefs, prejudices, rivalries, and schemes of a great array of personalities and people.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best defines the underlined word below? international aid can be used to combat drug trafficking. a. ille
mars1129 [50]

Although negotiations may be effective, but legal trade will serve as the best international aid for the combat of drug trafficking.

<h3>What is drug trafficking?</h3>

Drug trafficking can often be understood as the smuggling or illegal trade of the prohibited drugs and other such commodities via loopholes in the international laws.

Drug trafficking can be avoided by two or more governments by the way of negotiations; however, a more solid aid will be provided by the legalization of trade of drugs to a certain limit.

Hence, option B; Legal trade is one of the best ways that provided international aid against the drug trafficking.

Learn more about drug trafficking here:

brainly.com/question/16939546

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the most important feature that shaped the era of new imperialism but not the era of old imperialism
    13·1 answer
  • The ideas contained in the Declaration of Independence helped encourage new settlers in South America to assimilate native popul
    12·1 answer
  • Eastern European Nations under the control of the Soviet Union were allowed free, unfettered access to the Western world and pro
    14·2 answers
  • What is the strongest influenced by the jungle
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP QUICKLY!!!
    10·1 answer
  • I need help it looks easy
    12·1 answer
  • Russia was part of the Allied powers during World War I.
    6·2 answers
  • why might the executive director of the Sierra club have described the discion to remove endangered species protections for yell
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following are causes of the
    12·1 answer
  • The largest Vietnamese population in the United States is in:
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!