Answer:
Mania
Explanation:
Mania is a mood or emotional disorder that is characterized by abnormal elevation of energy level, mood and also distortion of sense of judgement.
This extended state of intense and wild elation usually last over a period of one week to be referred to as mania. Individuals experiencing mania usually tend engage in increased goal- driven activities compared to general activities.
The extremely high mood or energy displayed a manic individual could include inappropriate euphoria, elevated sexual urges, inappropriate social behavior, increased spending etc.
Therefore, Sienna was most likely experiencing mania.
Because it is a mosque which is the Islam version of church so a holy sacred place
Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
1) the bourgeoisie resented its exclusion from political power and positions of honour
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
