Answer:
Here: 2 7/18
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helped and brainlest please!
Answer:
e. reject the null hypothesis the p value is less than 0.05. therefore the difference is significant.
Step-by-step explanation:
given that after comparing response times between the audio and picture portions of the MIT test, the t-test resulted in a t-value of 2.97.
test statistic t = 2.97
Sample size n =250
Critical value of t at 95% is 1.96
We find that test statistic absolute value is greater than 1.96
So p value would be less than 0.05
This implies that null hypothesis stands in the rejected region.
So reject null hypothesis would be correct conclusion. Sample size cannot be said to be small as more than 30 itself is a good sample size.
e. reject the null hypothesis the p value is less than 0.05. therefore the difference is significant.
1. 0.95 x 6700 = 6365
2. 0.45 x 910 = 409.5
Answer:
No, the reference point selected for the properties of a substance does't have any effect on thermodynamic analysis.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the provided information.
We need to determine that the reference point selected for the properties of a substance have any effect on thermodynamic analysis.
The answer for this question is No.
The reference point selected for the properties of a substance does't have any effect on thermodynamic analysis.
Because in thermodynamic analysis we are deal with the change in the properties.
If we are doing calculation, the reference state chosen is irrelevant as long as we use values in a single consistent array of tables and charts.
Hence, The reference point selected for the properties of a substance does't have any effect on thermodynamic analysis.
