Answer: I would say option 2. Sharp teeth
Explanation:
Due to carnivores eating primarily meat, their teeth need to be sharp to cut, tear, and rip the skin/meat on their prey. (Hope this helped :D )
1.The treaty was signed on June 28,1919
2. The treaty was signed in Versailles Place and received its name from the location
3.The treaty has been criticized over the years and been blamed for the rise of the Nazis
4.The treaty states in the 'War Guilt Clause' that Germany must take complete blame for the war
5.Many people in Germany did not wish for the treaty to be signed but understood it was the better of their two options
6.The Versailles Place was considered the appropriate place to hold the signing because of its size
7. The major contributors to the treaty were the "Big Three"
8. The "Big Three" were David Lloyd George of Britain, Clemenceau of France, and Woodrow Wilson of U.S.A
9. The treaty forced Germany's army to be reduced to 100,000 men and no tanks were allowed (remember fighter planes weren't invented yet)
10. The League of nations was set up to keep world peace
Answer:
The answer is B, Vladimir Lenin took them out of WWI because of the revolution
Answer:
1. War and insecurity 2. Economic crisis (poverty) 3. Overpopulation
Explanation:
1. War and insecurity - as example Syrian crisis and war against ISIS
2. Economic crisis (poverty) - mass immigration from Poland to USA in the late XIX and early XX century.
3. Overpopulation - mass immigration to Europe from African countries in the last few decades.
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
