Answer:
TEs are repetitive and mobile elements, thereby it is hard to trace their origins
Explanation:
Repetitive elements are patterns of nucleotide sequences in the DNA characterized to have multiple copies throughout the genome. DNA mini-satellite and Transposable Elements (TEs) are some examples of highly repetitive DNA. TEs are repetitive mobile elements that have the ability to jump within the genome and occupy a major part of eukaryotic genomes. For instance, there is a type of TEs called retrotransposons which mobilize through a copy-and-paste mechanism, thus increasing their number in a genome. In consequence, TEs represent highly repetitive and dynamic genomic sequences, and thereby it is hard to trace their evolutionary histories.
<span>Well, Polysaccharides are complex carbohydrate polymersc consisting of more than 2 monosaccharides together covalently by glycosidic linkages in a condensation reaction. There are two types of polysaccharides first homo-polysaccharides and hetero-polysaccharides. A homo-polysaccharide is defined to have only one type of monosaccharide repeating in the chain; whereas, a hetero-polysaccharide is composed of two or more types of monosaccharides.</span>
Three roles of the DNA molecule in heritage are in storage, copying and transmitting genes.
A-DNA: It is a right-handed double helix similar to the B-DNA form. ...
B-DNA: This is the most common DNA conformation and is a right-handed helix. ...
Z-DNA: Z-DNA is a left-handed DNA where the double helix winds to the left in a zig-zag pattern.
Answer:
im pretty sure it should be C
Explanation:
each of the cells in the body would 'differenciate' (as the name suggests) to become specialized cells that are going to work within an organisms different organs and body parts
The leaders of the earliest philosophers were Socrates and Aristotle. This led the thinkers who arrived at the conclusion regarding the Primary Entity.
<h3>
What was the proof for the conclusion of the Primary Entity?</h3>
Their logic for arriving at the above conclusion that "the primary entity (arche) always persists)" was that, since nothing can be completely annihilated or truly generated from the origin, but each returns to it's origin if they are destroyed, then it means that the primary entity must always persist.
In simple language, nothing is either destroyed or created.
Learn more about Socrates at:
brainly.com/question/944794
