Simply an uncontrolled fire that is wiping out large fields and areas of land. It is typically fires that started out of a lightning strike, or people carelessly starting it
Answer:
The correct answer is - A. The data comparing the fruits produced per flower with the number of butterfly visits are most useful in refuting the claim, because they show that the tree produces fruit even if the butterfly does not visit the flowers.
Explanation:
In this experiment, the table shows that specific butterflies did not go to small flower trees or go once a day where is in medium and large flower trees respectively they visit more than small flowers.
Even after not visiting small flower trees the nectar energy and the fruit production is almost similar to the other two trees. This case can occur only in one case if there are one or more pollinators present in this scenario other than this type of specific butterflies.
Thus, the correct answer is - option A.
Answer:
a. (A_B_),(A_bb)(aaB_)(aabb)
Explanation:
This scenario is an example of recessive epistasis.
It involves two recessive alleles concealing the expression of an allele at varying locus.
The 9:7 ratio seen in this case is a rare form of epistasis known as duplicative recessive epistasis (a situation in which the other gene expression are masked due to the effect of either aa or bb presence on them).
In this scenario, if snails possess two copies of one or the other allele I.e allele a or allele b, pigment production would be inhibited leading to albino individuals.
A recessive phenotype is seen for a homozygous recessive gene at Gene A or Gene B.
Therefore, the genotypes of the offspring is AABB, AaBB, AABb, aaBb, aaBB, AAbb, Aabb and aabb.