Answer:
Discriminant validity
Explanation:
Discriminant validity is shown through evidence that a measure is not inordinately related to other similar, yet different construct. It is also known as divergent validity.
Discriminant validity helps to determine how similar a test is to another thus proving Validity.
<span>Most likely it is "Rap".</span>
<span>Rap music
highlights verses loaded with slang and </span>similar phrases which attract the common American adolescent. Also another reason for the adolescents to like it is that rap music is an assorted type, used
to express a wide assortment of substances and desires, aspirations etc.
Answer:
Bell- since the neutral stimulus becomes the CS
Explanation:
Conditioned stimulus: The term "conditioned stimulus" is a part of the classical conditioning experiment, which was proposed by Ivan Pavlov.
In classical conditioning, the conditioned stimulus is defined as the formerly neutral stimulus after being associated or connected with an unconditioned stimulus, it triggers a conditioned response. The term conditioned stimulus is also referred to as CS.
In the question above, the CS is Bell- since the neutral stimulus becomes the CS.
Answer:
b. symbolic.
Explanation:
In the scenario explained in the question, Jill used the symbolic approach. The reason is Jill witnessed Micheal having fun with his friends in the mall whereas he missed practice due to illness. This led him to believe that he faking his illness.
So he made Micheal practice the next day. This symbolized that he knows that Micheal is not ill and can run.
I hope the answer is helpful.
Thanks for asking.
<span>Women and men differ in their career choices both across and within fields, and psychology is no exception. Although subfield segregation has been reduced over the years, subfield differences persist (see Table 1). For example, in 2002, 82.7% of PhDs in developmental psychology were awarded to women, while only 56.2.% of PhDs in experimental psychology were awarded to women. (We excluded comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality because of the small number of graduates: 7, 13, 8, and 23, respectively.) However, of new PhDs awarded in psychology in 2002, women earned more than 50% across all subfields (again, excluding comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality). Unfortunately, the increasing number and proportions of psychologists who are women have not translated into equal professional participation across various subfields and leadership positions within psychology.</span>