The appropriate response is Ethnocentrism, drive out European colonialism. Unmistakably the essential main impetus for the Imperialism in Europe was ethnocentrism and not the prudent advantages the Europeans were making. Ethnocentrism is judging another culture exclusively by the qualities and measures of one's own way of life. Ethnocentric people judge different gatherings in respect to their own ethnic gathering or culture, particularly with worry for dialect, conduct, traditions, and religion.
The options that correctly describe cultural practices of the Byzantine and Arab empires is <em>The Byzantine Empire created mosaics of religious figures, whereas the Arabs prohibited religious art; </em>and <em>The Byzantine government was based on Greco-Roman Law, whereas the Arab government was based on Sharia law.</em>
A unique practice in the Orthodox Church is the decoration of churches with mosaics portraying religious figures taken from The Bible. However, a fundamentalist religious movement called <em>Iconoclasm </em>emerged within the Byzantine Empire in the ninth century with the goal of banning the worshiping of religious figures (icons; from Greek εἰκονο, <em>eikono, </em>image).<em> </em>Even though this doctrine was short-lived, it proved both costly and bloody for the empire. On the other hand, the worshiping of images by the Arabs was prohibited as Muhammed spread the word of Islam in the mid seventh century. In fact, Islam prohibited the depiction of any living thing, just like the First Commandment in the Jewish Ten Commandments.
As of law, the Byzantine empire preserved the Greco-Roman law tradition as the surviving portion of the Roman Empire whose Western part fell in 476 A.D. However, up to that moment laws had not been coded in writing, which prompted Byzantine Emperor Justinian to create a legal code bearing his name in the sixth century. In contrast, the Arabic Empire was ruled through <em>Sharia (divine law </em>in Arabic), or the law stemming from the sacred book of Islam, <em>Quran</em>.
Slaves were used in the North for different purpose. In the North, slave labor helped to provide the food necessary to feed the Union army is a false statement.
<h2>Slavery in the North</h2>
In the north, plantation slavery were used in each colony, where they cultivate staple crop colonists chose to cultivate.
In the war, African Americans were used for military purposes. in the South, they were used as enslaved labor and in the north, they were used as wage labor and military volunteers.
The North did not support slavery in full
. They oppose slavery was based on political and anti-south sentiment, economic factors, etc.
Learn more about slaves from
brainly.com/question/9374853
Answer:
It required fewer people to produce goods
