a. ONE major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that David M. Potter described the Civil War as an inevitable event given the institutionalized sectionalism between the North and the South. On the other hand, Michael F. Holt held that the Civil War was an anomaly in American compromise-reaching political tradition.
b. ONE specific historical event or development during 1786-1861 that could support Potter's interpretation is the breakdown of the two-party system. This development pitted far-right democratic republicanism, which promoted white supremacy, whereas center-right republicanism accepted black equality.
Another historical development to support Potter's interpretation is that the South welcomed the Jim Crow laws and sanctioned the separation principle. On the other hand, the North sought to overturn the law and practice of separatism.
c) According to Holt, the Civil War is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise. During the Great Compromise of 1787, healthy rivalry ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Thus, David M. Potter held that the ingrained divisions between the North and the South caused the Civil War, while Michael F. Holt held that the breakdown of the two-party system occasioned the Civil War.
Learn more about the different historical interpretations of the Civil War here: brainly.com/question/11705791
Students who receive a comprehensive civics education in school learn that voting is an important duty of every citizen. ... They can reference their civics lessons to separate fact from fiction, allowing them to become educated and proactive voters.
p.s. i googled this
It is a false statement that every man and woman communicates in exactly the same way.
<h3>What makes the difference in the communication?</h3>
Men tends to communicate because they share information and accomplish a task while women do so to build relationships and develop understandings.
Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Read more about communication
<em>brainly.com/question/26152499</em>
#SPJ4
Answer:
commitment to what exactly?
Here are some options to chose from:
-Slavery was more common in South Carolina
-In South Carolina there was a divided society between rich and poor
- there were many Scots-Irish imigrants in the region
I think the first option is the most significant.
