They have more power and are not dull
The answer would be Khrushchev.
Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Hey there! I'm happy to help you out!
The Glorious Revolution was a very significant time in British history. The main dealio during the time was the writing of the English Bill of Rights, which actually inspired the American Bill of Rights. Basically, a constitutional monarchy was set up instead of a complete monarchy because they gave Parliament a lot of power.
I hope that this helps you! Have a wonderful day!
He <span>rose to </span>power<span> by forming an alliance with Pompey, a general, and Crassus, an affluent patrician. The three men seized control over the Roman Republic in 59 B.C. Eventually, the first triumvirate came to an end, and </span>Julius Caesar <span>made himself the absolute ruler of the territory.
</span>
