1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
3 years ago
9

The outcome of the Supreme Court's Dred Scott case decided that Question 14 options: Slaves that lived on free soil after one ye

ar were free. slaves could sue for freedom in a federal court. Slaves were not citizens, but the property of their owner slaves could purchase freedom after gaining citizenship
History
1 answer:
ElenaW [278]3 years ago
4 0

The decision effectively stated that states could not be 'free' or a 'slave state' because its unconstitutional for states to exclude slave ownership in territories. The decision also stated that slaves were not citizens, thus could not sue in federal court. The best answer is that slaves were not citizens.

You might be interested in
What was chamberlain and churchill <br> And what they did in world war 2
yKpoI14uk [10]
Chamberlain led Britain in the first of the war  the general Churchill succeeded him. <span />
3 0
3 years ago
By 1850, which four states had more people than Tennessee?​
icang [17]

Answer: n 1850, the United States contained 31 states and 4 organized territories (Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah).

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Anyone know the answer ????
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

1. we americans are brave DUHHH

2. it told how brave they were fighting against the british and won

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How long did the molimo festival last in forest people?
Annette [7]
The Molimo festival occurred every nights for a period of two months

It was a music festival of the forest people the pygmies.The Molimo festival, which includes singing and sometimes dancing, occurs every night for two months and Only men attend the festival.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why the Germans were not happy with the War guilt clause of the Treaty of Versailles.
natima [27]
The Germans were also furious about the various terms of the Treaty. They hated clause 231 – the ‘War Guilt’ clause – which stated that Germany had caused ‘all the loss and damage’ of the war. Firstly, the Germans did not think that they had caused the war (for the Germans, the war was a war of self-defence against Russia, which had mobilised 31 July 1914). During the 1920s, the Germans published all their secret documents from 1914, to prove they had tried to stop the war. Secondly, the Germans hated clause 231 because accepting it gave the Allies the moral right to punish Germany – it validated all the harsh terms of the Treaty.


Hope this helps:)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was confederate diplomacy toward great britain unsuccessful?
    12·2 answers
  • Made illegal the writing, publishing, or printing of "any false scandalous and malicious writing" about the president, congress,
    10·1 answer
  • How do spiritual songs help Empower slave
    12·2 answers
  • Catharine Maria Sedgwick authored what work that challenged the traditional perceptions of the woman’s role on 1850’s American s
    10·1 answer
  • What efforts were made to avoid the civil war
    11·1 answer
  • Which one of these industries suffer the least likely to be victim to information systems hacking
    15·1 answer
  • How does Gyeong-hee’s perspective develop over the course of the story?
    7·1 answer
  • Which factor contributed to the fall of both the Incan and the Aztec empires? A. Civil wars continued. B. Their emperors betraye
    8·1 answer
  • Bob bought the 24 fish for $51.36
    12·1 answer
  • What is the most likely purpose for including the statement at the top of the authorization form?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!