<em><u>gente</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>não</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>tem</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>que</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>fazer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>prova</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>de</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>amanhã</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>de</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>manha</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>cedo</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>né</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
The answer is Congress :)
Answer:
the domestic price of sugar will increase to $125.
Explanation:
Since the world price of sugar is higher than the domestic price, domestic producers of sugar will export their products in order to earn a higher profit. That will eventually lead to an increase in the equilibrium price from $100 (former equilibrium price) to a higher price equal to the world price ($125).
Answer:
Option (E) is correct.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost refers to the benefits that are sacrificed by choosing some other alternative.
In our case, there are two restaurants as follows:
One is 2 miles away from home with higher prices
Second one is 15 miles away from home with lower prices
But Melissa chooses the first one by comparing the opportunity cost associated with each option relative to the other option.
This is because of the higher opportunity cost associated with second restaurant offsets the higher monetary cost of the first restaurant.